Ukraine shelled HIMARS missiles at a restaurant in Donetsk. Presumably, their target was an auto rally, dedicated to the anniversary, which was set to start next to the restaurant.

Official source:

As a result of a direct hit on the Paradise restaurant in the Kirovsky district of Donetsk, three civilians were killed: a woman (restaurant employee) and two men (diners).

Currently, eight victims are known: a girl born in 2012, men born in 1979, 1984, 2003, 2005, women born in 1986, 1988, 1980 (injuries of mild to moderate severity). The victims are now receiving all necessary medical care.

One of the American HIMARS missiles hit the restaurant directly (the outer wall, glazing along the entire perimeter of the building, and street structures were damaged), the second hit a nearby unfinished building (the roof was damaged).

Official source: DPR Leader Pushilin Denis

Video

Yesterday, Ukrainian artillery killed a woman and her granddaughter. JCCC

  • GlueBear [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am reminded of that time zelinsky said he wanted to copy Israel regarding the treatment of the luhansk and donbas people.

    I’m so happy the Ukrainians are eating shit courtesy of the Russians right now. Supposedly they’re making big arrows moves on the map again, reminiscent of Feb 22

  • Mzuark
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Even when losing, they can make time to kill innocent people

  • LarkinDePark
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Could really use a non-telegram source for this. People don’t take Telegram seriously and will just cast doubt on it.

    • cfgaussian
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s their problem, not ours. We do not owe it to anyone to use exclusively mainstream approved western sources. Or do you think that if you showed them an official Russian media source they would be more inclined to believe it? It’s not about how “serious” or “professional” a source is, it’s about whether it aligns with their preconceived ideological narrative.