• Lugh@futurology.todayOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Any time I hear claims that involve hitherto unknown laws of Physics I’m 99.99% sure I’m dealing with BS - but then again, some day someone will probably genuinely pull off such a discovery.

    • bruhbeans@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m gonna go out on a limb here and guess that NASA has physicists that understand how and why this thing works, and the article title is just bullshit.

      • xor@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        they do, and tested it extensively… and determined it doesn’t provide any thrust and the earlier tests that showed a tiny bit were just sensors malfunctioning from the microwaves…
        i’m going go ahead and call this article:
        probably bullshit

        • corroded@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Are you sure? What you say is true of the EM drive, but this looks like it’s a completely different technology. As far as the article is written, it doesn’t sound like microwaves are used at all.

          What has me skeptical is that they say the device produces enough thrust to counteract its own mass, which would be revolutionary. Why are we not reading about this all over the news?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s very likely, but it’s almost certainly going to involve an extreme thing we can barely measure. The whole reason physics is stuck where it is is that all the things we have access to are described perfectly by the system we have, even if it’s not fully self-consistent.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        This wasn’t NASA, though. This was a sci-fi writer, writing about a putative claim by someone who got paid by NASA at some point in the past.

        Ditto for the couple ex-CIA guys that claim there’s alien dissections or whatever. Big organizations inevitably employ all sorts.

  • admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    They literally are claiming they found a new fundamental force.

    It’s bullshit. He’s a liar and “the debrief” should be goddamned ashamed of publishing this tripe.

  • BenFranklinsDick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Did nobody else see this was written by a FUCKING SCIENCE FICTION AUTHOR?

    The flags are there, and they are red.

  • Amerikan Pharaoh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    a NASA veteran claims their Propellantless Propulsion Drive, that physics says shouldn’t work, just produced enough thrust to overcome Earth’s gravity

    What’s that? No replication? Not even peer reviewed? Fuck are we reporting on it for, then? It’s giving “alien spheroids from deep space” that will later turn out to match terran iron to a 99.9999% level of accuracy energy; and that’s not a good look

    Dr. Charles Buhler, a NASA engineer and the co-founder of Exodus Propulsion Technologies

    That smells even worse. Company’s a year old and all I can reliably find on it is a company profile on “Corporation Wiki”; no website, no real information on them, but this company just apparently cracked physics. Lmao okay. This is a grift for a coming IPO, I’d bet my left leg on it.

    IF anyone else can replicate these findings, he might be onto something-- but with how many outright scams PhD’s have tried pushing in the last four years regarding exotic sciences, I don’t… Believe shit out of this sector without the actual rigors of the Method being applied to what people are flapping their jaws about.

      • Amerikan Pharaoh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Steve from Accounting is a prick who thinks it’s okay to microwave his fish in the break room come lunchtime, I’d need a double-check and a second opinion if Steve from Accounting told me the sky was blue.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Best Lemmy World post: “I put this article through an AI generator and it made this image, here’s a description I made with ChatGPT” 🤓☝

      Worst Lemmy Grad post:

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The hilarious irony about this is that I actually made a theoretical framework for how such a drive could be possible and then was shocked as shit when I found out their solution was magical time travelling particles. Like even they knew it was complete and utter bullshit.

  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    […] Another unusual result from their tests was that sometimes the tested devices did not require a constant input of electrical charge to maintain their thrust. Given that the device already appears to violate the known laws of physics by creating thrust without propellant, this result even stumped Dr. Buhler and his team.

    Hold up a minute, not only does this thing generate momentum out of essentially nowhere “a new fundamental force”, it is also able to generate thrust without a constant supply of energy?

    If I told you my car could run without petrol, you’d call me a liar, but apparently this didn’t ring alarm bells to them?

  • hotspur@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I get the skepticism in the comments here, but having finished the article, the team seems as perplexed as the rest of us as to why/what is happening here, and seems very interested in getting outside scientists and companies to try and figure it out. Basically they don’t seem to be the standard vaporware sellers playbook, but of course, who knows, most things like this are total bullshit.

    My fake conspiracy joke explanation: all those physics breaking lozenge ufos that have been making the rounds the last couple years are some lizard man tech we’ve had all along, and this is a half assed attempt to introduce the tech publicly without having to explain they had it already. OR similar vein, but the super-dimensional tic-tac operators (either aliens or multi-dimensional humans from the future like in interstellar) are trying to share this miracle tech with us and this is the avenue they chose.

    • DeLacue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m not merely sceptical I know this is bunk. Not because they’re claiming they accidentally stumbled onto something akin to cold fusion, or the incredible claim that they’ve found a new fundamental force that everyone else completely missed. No I know it’s bunk because they’re already talking to the press about and releasing statements with their claims before the paper is ready.

      Every credible organisation if they stumbled on something like this would lock things down. They wouldn’t make any statements until they have double, triple or quadruple-checked everything. Making a massive claim that can make world news but quickly gets debunked is poison to a group’s credibility. So every group that cares about their credibility would only officially confirm anything once every single i is dotted and every t is crossed.

      The fact that they’re already talking to the press means they don’t have the real evidence to prove their extraordinary claims and they know it. This is a scam and the whole “We don’t know what causes it” is simply a tactic to make it harder to debunk while they fish for gullible investors to sink money into their scheme.

      • hotspur@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah that’s a good point. Also it’s the debrief, not like the New York Times, so that doesn’t exactly instill confidence.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I wouldn’t call it bullshit. This is how science operates. We wouldn’t have breakthroughs if we just never followed up on weird shit happening in labs. And it’s just as important to shut down bad avenues as it is to find good ones. In fact most of the time this ends up with another team figuring out the first team left the microwave on or something. As long as the first team is open and honest it’s working the way it’s supposed to.

  • Erasmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Me reading this article and hearing the opening them to Star Trek in the background the whole time…

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Well, kind of yes (or yeah…).
        But everything about this is now an oversimplification since science can’t describe it properly now.
        This image is a simplified schematic describing one of their devices made with the intent of creating an asymmetric electric field which according to the inventors would be somehow related to the trust which they claim they have measured.
        There are maybe around 20 of these images included in the patent for which I gave the link and I decided to put one of those images in my comment so users could have an intuitive idea of what their devices could look like … which is completely different from the bogus image in the post article.

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes … and this is also part of the reason why I chose this image (out of maybe 20 other from the patent) to be included in my above comment 👍 ΣFx≠0

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    They did this on Mythbusters in small scale years ago and the science of it is fascinating.

    I don’t think it would do much to break orbit, but once IN space it could be interesting.

    https://youtu.be/UCiU96rJJoo

    This is what they were testing:

    https://youtu.be/006d36WWyaQ

    You take a lightweight balsawood frame, wrap it in tinfoil and lightweight wire, then pump high voltages through it.

    https://hackaday.com/2016/07/13/expanding-horizons-with-the-ion-propelled-lifter/

    • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      7 months ago

      Note that what the mythbusters looked at was a form of ion propulsion. The high voltage on the sharp boundary of the aluminum foil repels air molecules. If you put one of those in a vacuum (or space) it wouldn’t have any thrust.

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you put one of those in a vacuum (or space) it wouldn’t have any thrust.

        IIRC, the MythBusters did exactly that later in the episode. Unsurprisdngly, the devices produced no thrust in a vacuum chamber.

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      That isn’t propellant-less. The propellant is air, and in space where there is no atmosphere they typically use xeon gas

  • set_secret@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    I gave the article to gpt 4 and it said nothing and simply generated this image…

    I asked if it was bullshit too and it said. 'Given the current understanding of physics, it’s highly unlikely. Extraordinary claims like this require extraordinary evidence, and until such evidence is thoroughly vetted and confirmed by the wider scientific community, skepticism remains warranted.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Daily reminder that the troll face used “ra-e rodent” as a reference and is a symbol used by pedophile rings to identify each other.

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          OK you know and are doing it on purpose. Gross.

          EDIT: Yep and here comes the pedo brigade, right on time.

          • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Pedo brlgade

            Or people just don’t appreciate, that a random on the Internet insinuates another person is a pedo, based on using common memes. That sort of stupid shit typically gets a facepalm, and a downvote.

            • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Nope it was the case, because I had a huge surge of downvotes and now they’re gone. That only happens when inauthentic activity is removed. It’s not like reddit where an AI goes across every post and automatically removes brigading, the admins have to manually get involved meaning it takes awhile for someone downvoting from alternate accounts to get addressed. That and the fact that the federated nature of the platform makes creating alternate accounts solely for the sake of vote manipulation extremely easy.

      • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’d be willing to bet that the blinding majority does not use it as described, nullifying the premise of your theory. In any case, the more we use it, the less useful it’d be in your alleged use case.

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The blinding majority have moved on to more modern expressions, it’s just the holdovers who didn’t get the memo and the creeps at this point.