Start by dismantling the housing market. Make owning multiple investment properties illegal, initially give a “sale by” time ordered by the government, if it’s not met, the government bid must be accepted. That bid should initially be at the low end of the Market but as time goes on, and this opening move at dismantling Capitalism leaves the news cycle that bid should drop to half the market value.
Make housing a right, drastically subsidizing the cost of home purchase on a sliding scale so it’s cheapest for the poorest.
During this process, more and more people will have the government for a landlord. For these people offer rent-to-buy schemes, where the rent dollars are paying the mortgage price. Once an amount is paid, the renter gets the deed to the home.
Soon all home sales would be done for people to use the actual properties being bought, and homelessness would be greatly reduced.
I say all this because to dismantle Capitalism you need a feasible plan for all the sectors being targeted.
But most of all you need this plan so you can demand your leftist party to take action on it. You need something to point to, and say THIS, this is what we want you to do. Saying “dismantle Capitalism” is not enough.
…and in all honesty, you’ll most likely have to run for office, and create the party yourself if you want anything like this to happen.
Lmfao, anyone still putting their hopes of abolishing capitalism in electoral politics (or the governments that result, and their actions), at the very least, hasn’t been paying any attention, and has very little to no understanding of how the systems at play work and interact.
Playing by their rules within their game (this includes not only electoral politics, but also shit like using housing as a commodity, however supposedly noble the intent) is never going to set anyone free from it.
Yeah, people don’t give up power willingly, they have to be forced. Especially when they think it’s something they rightfully own.
At the end of the day it’s just self interest in action.
You could do it non-violently… In the sense that the Civil Rights Movement or Indian Independence were non-violent.
Mostly.
And there was certainly violence directed against them.
And it only worked because there were enough people who very, very firmly believed in the cause… And there’s always, always the implication of or else.
Start by dismantling the housing market. Make owning multiple investment properties illegal, initially give a “sale by” time ordered by the government, if it’s not met, the government bid must be accepted. That bid should initially be at the low end of the Market but as time goes on, and this opening move at dismantling Capitalism leaves the news cycle that bid should drop to half the market value.
Make housing a right, drastically subsidizing the cost of home purchase on a sliding scale so it’s cheapest for the poorest.
During this process, more and more people will have the government for a landlord. For these people offer rent-to-buy schemes, where the rent dollars are paying the mortgage price. Once an amount is paid, the renter gets the deed to the home.
Soon all home sales would be done for people to use the actual properties being bought, and homelessness would be greatly reduced.
I say all this because to dismantle Capitalism you need a feasible plan for all the sectors being targeted.
But most of all you need this plan so you can demand your leftist party to take action on it. You need something to point to, and say THIS, this is what we want you to do. Saying “dismantle Capitalism” is not enough.
…and in all honesty, you’ll most likely have to run for office, and create the party yourself if you want anything like this to happen.
Lmfao, anyone still putting their hopes of abolishing capitalism in electoral politics (or the governments that result, and their actions), at the very least, hasn’t been paying any attention, and has very little to no understanding of how the systems at play work and interact.
Playing by their rules within their game (this includes not only electoral politics, but also shit like using housing as a commodity, however supposedly noble the intent) is never going to set anyone free from it.
Yeah, people don’t give up power willingly, they have to be forced. Especially when they think it’s something they rightfully own.
At the end of the day it’s just self interest in action.
You could do it non-violently… In the sense that the Civil Rights Movement or Indian Independence were non-violent.
Mostly.
And there was certainly violence directed against them.
And it only worked because there were enough people who very, very firmly believed in the cause… And there’s always, always the implication of or else.