I’m a windows loser looking to make the plunge into Linux. I was thinking of switching my gaming PC to Linux in the near future. Before I make up my mind, I’ll probably try out VMs of distros.
I’ve lurked a few Linux communities here and on lemmy.ml, some I’m gonna regurgitate some things I half remember in the hope of being being corrected and starting discussion about what I should be doing.
- Ubuntu isn’t good
- Mint is good despite being based on Ubuntu. Made with former windows users in mind
- Debian is good because of their packages or package manager or something. Recently sold out, but there are spinoffs that don’t use proprietary software like Duvian.
- Fedora seemed to get some good word but I can’t remember why.
- Arch and it’s spinoffs require a shit ton of finagling to get right but can do a lot of cool things
- There are different desktop environments like GNOME, Cinnamon, and … others? I honestly don’t know what a desktop environment is.
- Wine (or the fork Proton) can run windows native games on Linux
- There are snap, flat something or other, and … other ways for installing software.
I’m sure I’m missing a lot and got some things wrong. Any help getting started is appreciated.
Edit: I ended up going with a KDE plasma spin of Fedora 36. Once I figured out how to get the nvidia drivers set up it was smooth sailing.
Kind of. I like flatpak more. Both due to the fact that snap has a proprietary backend, and because flatpak just works better in my experience.
That is true. AppImages are great for software that just doesn’t want to work on your computer. I’ve been using them for Cura.
Guix is interesting, but I don’t particularly like lisp, though that’s just personal preference.
I’d personally prefer to install deb files using
apt
. That way, it will handle dependencies, conflicts, etc. whereasdpkg
is the low-level package manager that only installs and configures the software.Speaking of cross-platform packaging tools, I recently made something interesting in that field about a month ago: https://github.com/Arsen6331/lure.
Yeah, apt is for normal users, and for sysadmins trying to solve particular problems that apt won’t solve for some reason. But a new user, like OP, should be using synaptic (or some other GUI front-end for apt). I think Mint does a good job of surfacing it?
Package managers really aren’t difficult to use. They’re quite simple, especially
apt
. To install, just dosudo apt install software
. To remove,sudo apt remove software
, etc.I encourage new users to use the command line for basic tasks from day one, so that they can learn about it, rather than just using GUI forever.
I mean, i agree that package managers aren’t difficult to use, and I live in the command line (or actually in Emacs), but there’s a widespread perception that you have to use the terminal to use Linux. It helps to dispel this perception by pointing people at reasonable GUI tools like synaptic.
Yeah, I agree, but there’s also a perception that the command-line is scary, which I would also like to dispel.
I haven’t even made the switch yet and I don’t know why people would see the command line as scary.