Now Windows’ only built-in text editor, there’s more room for Notepad to grow.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    The entire point of Notepad was that it didn’t have fancy features, it just edited text files. They got rid of Wordpad, and now they’re gonna turn Notepad into Wordpad.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The entire reason notepad still exists is that it edits and saves to plain text files. I do not see how an opt-in spellcheck or autocorrect interferes with that – though honestly, I don’t see who the possible customer is for those features either. It’s a waste of time, but it doesn’t undermine the application.

      What reason, honestly, did Wordpad have to exist? Who was clamoring for an RTF editor but thought any of the free the full-featured ODF editors or online service a la Google docs were not up to the task? Seems a lot of people are salty that Wordpad was dropped, but I just don’t get who was using it. This from someone so frustrated and annoyed by pretty much all WYSIWYG doc editors that I’ve lately been doing more stuff in latex despite how irrational I know I am being.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I found it useful occasionally for a pretty niche use case. I automated generating documents with a program I wrote, then cleaned it up a bit in Wordpad before sending it on.

        That’s about as niche as you can get, but I wonder if it’s not too uncommon. RTF is easy to generate programmatically, and it’s pretty widely supported across various platforms. I have since moved on, but maybe others haven’t.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        RTF has to be one of the most atrocious document formats. It’s such a jumbled mess, it should be buried and forgotten. You can make it clean but of course Microsoft doesn’t.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        but I just don’t get who was using it.

        way more than you realize. i’ve been supporting home users and small businesses for thirty years. i run into wordpad users frequently.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      i think its tasteful to have a couple QOL features like code highlighting, tabs, spellchecking etc.

      i didnt notice this until i went back from gedit to notepad the other day

  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    wordpad gets kicked to the curb because microsoft thinks they can sell a few more office subscriptions if the most basic of word processors wasn’t included with windows.

    meanwhile. notepad, the basic text editor that lacks even the basic formatting features found in wordpad, gets the spellchecker users have wanted in wordpad since windows write for windows 1.0

    • po-lina-ergi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      I suspect it was more likely that nobody used wordpad because, well, why would you? So supporting it is more pain than it’s worth.

      I don’t think the wordpad to office pipeline represents quite the cashflow you’re implying

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        wordpad has always been gimped to keep it from taking any sales away from word. if microsoft wasn’t worried about wordpad, they would have tossed a spellchecker into it back in the 1990s (when wordpad replaced write) and it would, ya know… still exist (in upcoming versions of windows).

  • Kethal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    What is going on at Microsoft? Did anyone ask for this? How about they make search work again and not use 4 Gb just turn turn on the computer?

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’ll never be the Kate Text Editor! MS just likes to copy others.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Whatever else you can say about Windows 11—and whatever you think about its pushy tendencies and the Copilot feature that has been rolled out to pretty much everyone despite being labeled a “preview”—the operating system has ushered in a bit of a renaissance for decades-old built-in apps like Paint and Notepad.

    An updated version of Notepad currently rolling out to Windows Insiders in the Canary and Dev channels is adding two more modern features to the old app: spellcheck and autocorrect.

    Per usual, spellcheck in Notepad highlights misspellings with red squiggly underlines, and right-clicking the word or pressing Shift + F10 will pop up a short menu of suggested fixes.

    If you’re upgrading from the Windows 10 version of Notepad, the spellcheck and autocorrect features join the tabbed interface, redesigned Settings screen, an auto-resume feature, and a handful of other tricks that the app has learned throughout Windows 11’s development.

    Unlike Notepad, WordPad had been mostly left alone since a Windows 7-era refresh that added a user interface ribbon like the one in the (then-current) Office 2007 update.

    Updates to Notepad and other apps could roll out before then, though, in keeping with Microsoft’s “release them when they’re ready” approach to feature additions in the Windows 11 era.


    The original article contains 458 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!