You’ve yet to provide any sources contradicting what I said. Hold yourself to the same standard you keep trying to hold others too. Where is your proof?
You’re fundamentally confused, that we can agree on. Your claim is that SBU offices were not hit. I ask for proof. So far any circumstantial evidence that exists points to these offices being hit. You claim they were not, give me proof.
Or is proof only required for things that contradict what you claim? 😂
Where is the proof that the explosion on the street did not hit SBU offices on that street which was reported in the source I linked. Where is the proof?
You’ve yet to provide any sources contradicting what I said. Hold yourself to the same standard you keep trying to hold others too. Where is your proof?
deleted by creator
You’re fundamentally confused, that we can agree on. Your claim is that SBU offices were not hit. I ask for proof. So far any circumstantial evidence that exists points to these offices being hit. You claim they were not, give me proof.
Or is proof only required for things that contradict what you claim? 😂
deleted by creator
Oh so if something isn’t on your favorite propaganda outlet then it didn’t happen, that sure is unassailable logic. 😂
deleted by creator
You have shown no evidence of me being wrong. I’m curious to see how far will you go before you can admit that.
deleted by creator
Where is the proof that the explosion on the street did not hit SBU offices on that street which was reported in the source I linked. Where is the proof?