A chatbot used by Air Canada hallucinated an inaccurate bereavement discount policy, and a customer who flew based on this information sued the company over being misled. The small claims court sided with the deceived customer, arguing that the chatbot was acting as an official agent of Air Canada, and that there was no reason a customer should have to double check resources from one part of the Air Canada website against different parts of the same website.

  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    8 months ago

    This was inevitable and will instantly kill AI chatbots. I tried to explain this to my marketing team when they were all excited about an AI chatbot on our company website. Wonder if this will change their tune

  • carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 months ago

    According to Air Canada, Moffatt never should have trusted the chatbot and the airline should not be liable for the chatbot’s misleading information because Air Canada essentially argued that “the chatbot is a separate legal entity that is responsible for its own actions,” a court order said.

    Prepare for more of that, applied to weaponized drones

    • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I like to call it a hallucination, because while yes the thing isn’t smart enough to experience thoughts, it really gets at how absolutely unreliable these things are. People are talking to the thing and taking it seriously, and it’s just watching the pink dragons circle around

  • PeeOnYou [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 months ago

    air canada is a bunch of fucking thieves… my partner’s parents had a flight cancelled and then rebooked, and then cancelled, and then rebooked again 2 days later… Air Canada tried to send them $300 as compensation when the laws clearly state if its over 9 hours delayed then they owe $1000. When her parents refuted the $300 compensation they said it was too late, they already sent the $300. Now they have to go petition some air board something or other. On top of that when they rebooked the flight finally, they didn’t add the extra bag from the original ticket and wouldn’t let her dad board the plane, so my partner called the airline and gave them her credit card to add the goddamned bag again. Then when all was said and done they had charged both of them for the same bag. When my partner called them to dispute this, they said they only see 1 charge for the bag and tough luck.

    Fucking scam artists.

    • sexywheat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      IIRC they were rated the worst airline in all of North America a few years back, and totally well deserved.

      What privatisation of state industries/services does to a mf.

  • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    8 months ago

    I remember a state recently passed a law barring lawyers from using AI programs to generate legal documents, and this right here is why. Remove the possibility of lawyers appealing to “well it’s not our fault the document is wrong, the AI did it!”

  • DamarcusArt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh please, I really hope we get more stuff like this. Nothing will kill this fad faster than companies realising they’ve been swindled by techbros threatening them with FOMO and this algorithm bullshit won’t actually do anything useful for them.