The first and main reason for the KKE’s refusal to extend civil marriage to same-sex couples, which enshrines shared parental responsibility, is the commercialization of procreation and adoption. A second, equally important and related reason is that, in practice, the articles of the bill bypass the social right of a child to the motherhood-fatherhood relation as an evolving biosocial relationship. Our Party considers that parenthood is the relationship between a parent and child, which at the individual level reflects existing social relations. The KKE’s position is based on the rights of the child, i.e. the child’s social need to have ties with its mother and father. This need has an objective basis: the interrelated motherhood-fatherhood relation, resulting from the complementary function of man and woman in the process of procreation. The laws that are enacted must defend this right, not undermine it.

The preachers of “individual rights” have rushed to label the KKE as “homophobic”. They 'll do the same for this article.

  • SILLY BEAN
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    okay they make two points and neither make any sense:

    1. a child needs two parents, one woman and one man for healthy development

    this is argument is shit because its wrong. like, objectivley wrong. See here.

    1. Adoption by same sex couples causes commercialisation of reproduction

    which uhhh what are you talking about?

    • ReadFanon [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      For point two, there are some anti-adoption advocates out there which are worth listening to. They tend to be adoptees themselves and they speak out about the fact that the adoption industry is basically the soft end of a legitimised human trafficking operation.

      But this argument assumes that gay couples will adopt and that they will participate in the adoption industry as consumers rather than choosing to be childless, accessing sperm donation and surrogacy etc. so it’s pretty bogus.

      • SILLY BEAN
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        adoption industry

        oh great, another man made horror

        imma read up on whatever distopian shit this is, but holy shit just that combination of words sounds bad

        • ReadFanon [any, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Gotta be honest with you, it’s really grim and I don’t have the strength to engage with it much because there’s little that I can do about it and my mental health can’t afford to passively consume all the horrors and injustices of the world but Karpoozy seems to be a good anti-adoption/adoptee advocate to start with.

          There are people who advertise the children they are carrying with regards to their genetic “stock” and they basically sell the child off to the highest bidder. There’s really horrific racism embedded into the industry (of course 🙄) and this is only just scratching the surface of what it’s like today without digging into the history or anything.

          It’s really heartbreaking.