• eraclito@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I believe the question is missing somehow the main points… even if the switch cost the double or triple there are several strategic advantages that should take into account:

    • use Linux allow to growth the number of high specialized professional workers, investing on local resources;
    • invest in a local network of specialized companies, instead of financing the silicon valley with ours public money;
    • be less dependent by abroad technologies, get a major control of the system used;

    These are few that come to my mind…

    What would be really interesting to know is the percentage of the investment that stay in the region/country following a linux-based/opensource IT infrastructure for public bodies vs the current closed M$|OSX paradigm.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You know how you make the expertise in a large organisation?

      You call for volunteers to run a pilot, move one team or a product to open source alternatives, learn what skills are needed in your tech people, what transition training is needed for staff

      Have the pilot group select the desktop environment, change it if the choice generates too many tickets

      Take that and roll it out more broadly, possibly aligned with new desktop hardware rollouts

      Add to the good - you get to know that the US government couldn’t lean on a single American company for access to your organisation’s secrets