If lemmy.world finds this, please tell my starving children that I love them.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    But have you thought about the shareholders and the executives? They are the ones that really have it bad!

    If only those lazy poor people worked harder and pulled themselves up by this bootstraps.

    It’s not like we systemically work towards keeping them poor so we can have the power!

    Last quarter my 401k dropped by 0.3%! IM THE VICTIM HERE

    • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      To be fair when you have that much money 0.3% is a lot of money (for a poor person)

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        they still have so much they wouldn’t miss it if there wasn’t a number on his balance telling him he lost money.

        imagine how much 0.3% of some billionaire asshole’s money could help rebuild people’s lives.

        • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          My response was sarcastic, but also accurate, and yes that tiny bit could do a whole lot of good

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      We can’t let the elites got taxed too hard. What if I finally win a lottery and join the elites? My wealth would be sucked dry by the excessive tax!

  • Conyak@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m in my 40s and I honestly still don’t understand the appeal of the GOP to the average American. I have never seen them put forth a policy that does not seem to be shitting on one group or another. What has the GOP done in the last 40 years to make the average citizens life better?

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      shitting on one group or another

      That’s the whole point. They’re the party of oppression, and the people that follow that party believe that those groups should be oppressed.

    • Traister101@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s the interesting thing they don’t. They typically do the best they can to make lives worse for their constituents and they’ll be happy about it as long as the “others” are getting fucked over more than they are.

    • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That they hate some of all the other people the consevative voters hate, and they are happy to starve if the group they hate starve too.

      It is a stupid premise I know, but you can see posts about evil things the gop does, and somehow “centrists” find a way to blame the democrats for that.

      • words_number@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think that is actually true. The average poor republican doesn’t want to be wealthy, if that would mean that <insert minority of your choice> would also become more wealthy or have more rights. This also applies to other political subjects. I mean a poor republican who works a terribly paying job with no worker rights or healthcare would actively vote against politicians who say they’d want to change that situation, just to make sure that underage girls that got raped are forced to give birth to their unwanted childs they then can’t provide for.

        • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          It is sad, but I also agreed with that.

          Not sure why they are like that but as long as the ones they hate also suffer the conservatives are ok.

          But they never stop to see an alternative where anyone has to suffer.

      • TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Its partly like that but its MORE so that they are utterly convinced that all thier troubles including that they are poor is some other groups fault, and even when they do have doubts they are unable to express them without fear of losing thier status in thier in-group. So they will keep on voting against thier own interests and blaming the wrong people for the results.

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you don’t let people starve. They’ll learn to be lazy and it’ll be the downfall of our society! /s

    we should also get rid of the inheritance tax so I can make sure even more generations of my family will never need to work and be lazy! /s

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes we need the society to look like Hercule Poirot’s England where you had to wait for your uncle to die, or help them on the way, to get some inheritance.

  • nighty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    5 months ago

    When I feed the poor, they call me a saint, but when I ask why the poor are hungry, they call me a communist. - Hélder Câmara, an archbishop

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Câmara identified himself as a socialist and not as a Marxist, and while disagreeing with , had Marxist sympathies. In the Fallaci interview, he stated, “My socialism is special, it’s a socialism that respects the human person and goes back to the Gospels. My socialism is justice.” He said, concerning Marx, that while he disagreed with his conclusions, he agreed with his analysis of the capitalist society.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hélder_Câmara#Views

    • elDalvini@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That study states that brain damage can cause more conservative views, but the reverse isn’t true. Not everyone with conservative views has brain damage.

      • EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Idk I live in the south with lead pipes And lead has shown to cause brain damage And conservatives are the last to car about lead pipes

        Hell my house sewage is just being pumped under the street cause our streets water main is broken

        Yet the city claims it’s our responsibility to pay someone to dig up the street and fix it

        We fixed our pipes to the main but we can’t afford to do all of that

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          What are you saying, you want the government to just bring you clean water? Like, without sewage? Like through some sort of taxpayer funded infrastructure? Fucking commie.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Both can be true. Like a communicable disease, someone can have it and someone else can get infected and then also have it.

  • Mahonia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is kind of an aside but it’s always weird looking at caricatures of poverty from the 90s and earlier, where people live in modest homes they seem to own. Or people living alone in plain apartments in places like New York.

    A six-figure salary in so many cities means that you can probably rent a decent apartment and never own anything. It’s just so obvious that this system isn’t working.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re right, but on the other hand, no one in the 1980s watched Married With Children and thought, “a shoe salesman? With a house? How absurd!” Because houses were affordable.

        • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          housing used to be affordable. I’ve seen the value of the modest house i grew up in increase in value after my parents sold it so much that I can’t afford to even think about buying it now that i’m the age they were when they bought it. and it looks like the new owners have let it go to shit.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 months ago

            Exactly. People did talk about how homes on TV in the 1980s were unreasonably large, but the idea that Al Bundy’s family or Roseanne’s family couldn’t have a house at all was not even one people considered. Because of course you could afford a house.

  • Lath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Commie. The poor will just trade the food for drugs, might as well throw it away as trash and shoot anyone that gets near it.

    • EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Walmart is that you?!?!

      Source: I used to work at Walmart and they threw away so much stuff and locked it in a dumpster with constant surveillance

    • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Pretty sure the general attitude toward .world is that the users tend to be liberals, especially those who came from Reddit during the API fiasco. Generally people who mean well but probably haven’t engaged with the Linux, FOSS, Privacy, Anarchist, Socialist, or Communist communities before coming to Lemmy.

      .ml itself is generally more leftist, a common misconception is that there are only Marxist-Leninists on .ml, when there are tons of Anarchists and Socialists as well, just much fewer liberals.

      Where Hexbear is a big-tent “dirt bag left” server, and lemmygrad is an explicitly Marxist-Leninist-Maoist server, .ml is actually just focused on FOSS and privacy, and as such tends to attract more leftists than .world.

      An example of the differences between .world and .ml I have noticed are on the recent death sentence for the KyoAni mass murderer posts. On the .world version, most seemed celebratory of the death sentence, while on .ml most were deeply saddened by the event but held the belief that the death penalty is wrong fundamentally, and that instead it should’ve been life in prison.

      Just my 2 cents as a .ml user.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    as somewhat of a ‘commie’ yea kinda, but again its crazy that someone who toils away at work for the better part of his life and earns a salary for his contribution to society will sometimes have to be hungry or homeless. on average you do all that and are at least always struggling for money come on.

    considering we have smartphones, rockets and AI, at this point im surprised some people are not considering alternatives.

    • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do you think the Means of Production should be owned collectively, or individually? Do you agree with horizontal power structures being dominant, or do you believe more in centralization?

      There’s a ton more to it, but those 2 questions pretty clearly give you a direction.

        • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Collective ownership of the Means of Production is Socialism, generally. Communism is the specific Stateless, Classless, Moneyless society built on the foundations of Collective Ownership along Marxian analysis, but you can have Collective ownership in, say, Syndicalism, Anarchism, Market Socialism, Democratic Socialism, etc.

  • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    One of the defining traits of the left is empathy.
    One of the defining traits of humanity is empathy.
    If you’re not left you’re less than. I said it. I stand by it.

  • mcmoor@bookwormstory.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well, if you want to abolish currency, inheritance, and all personal property you may be far left. Otherwise you may just be a compassionate for the poor.

    • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      No leftist in their right mind wants to abolish personal property.

      Private property (factories and machinery) ≠ personal property (your clothes and fridge)

    • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Tbf we should be capable of sustainability which by definition we wouldn’t need an economy that just funnels for the rich.

  • angrytoadnoises
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    ‘Cuz you ain’t been doin nothin’, if you ain’t been called a red, if you’ve marched or agitated, then you’re bound to hear it said…