• CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean, that was my kneejerk reaction too. There’s more than just animal welfare at stake, though. Putting human organs in a critter has the potential to act like a bridge if we’re not careful, and essentially spawn new covids.

      • qooqie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m assuming there would be a lot of figuring out how to “wash” these organs before transfer. The growing being the first part of the problem, second part being sterilization and making sure no graft vs host. Can’t really wash these organs with tons of antibacterial or antivirals so it might be a really unique solution

        • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Antivirals only prevent replication, too. Virus capsids don’t respire and have to be physically destroyed to neutralise them. Which is hard when you’re trying to keep the delicate organ around them alive. Maybe you could use magical nanobots, but then why do you need an animal organ anyway?

          The actual research is more centered around stopping it from happening in the first place, and then screening for any contamination. The critters might be raised in completely sterile conditions, and have already been genetically modified to remove any included ancient viral sequences in published work. Of course, all the producers have to actually follow the regimen everywhere in the world…

      • Endward23@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Putting human organs in a critter has the potential to act like a bridge if we’re not careful, and essentially spawn new covids.

        Thats exact a problem. I personally think the solution could be a mixture of organoids and using this methode to create new organs. Since we are already able to cultived organoids. The problem is that his tissue doesn’t grow in the form of “natural” organs and do not make connections with the blood and nerv systems.

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So it’s a trolley problem between a small mammal or a human.

    I’d wager that over 80% of people would choose the human life over the small mammal.

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      And the majority of the remaining 20% are meat eaters, because there’s maybe a few percent vegetarians to start with. They’re offended if you point out the hypocrisy.

      Sometimes, when I’m very frustrated, I feel like the organs are better off keeping a pig alive, lol.

      Edit: Lol, Lemmy is shook. I said nothing factually untrue (except the exact percentages, maybe) and then vented about a feeling I have in dark moments. Cope and seethe.

  • ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Margaret Atwood continues to predict the near future with near perfect accuracy. I, for one, welcome our new pigoon overlords.

  • SchizoDenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Absolutely. We can breed animals specifically for this purpose. This can pose a solution to so many of life’s illnesses.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I didn’t watch the video, but haven’t there already been two pig transplant recipients that both died?