ylai@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agoHans Reiser Apologies For Social Mistakes, Comments On ReiserFS Deprecation From Prisonwww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1127arrow-down14
arrow-up1123arrow-down1external-linkHans Reiser Apologies For Social Mistakes, Comments On ReiserFS Deprecation From Prisonwww.phoronix.comylai@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·6 months agoWell, he put his brand name on it and now his brand name is synonymous with murder. Does he know we have ext4 and lvm now ? What did reiserfs have that we don’t have in lvm or btrfs ?
minus-squareNaN@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-26 months agoLVM has been around since 1998, LVM2 in 2003. I think he knows about it.
minus-squareNightwatch Admin@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·6 months agoI guess he or she meant btrfs
minus-squareSheeEttin@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 months agoIt had a bunch of features that weren’t in ext3, which was generally standard at the time, depending on how conservative your distro was.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-26 months agoIt is still a cool thing, from reading about it. Could have some advantages of ZFS without performance penalties and complexity, if the project wouldn’t die. EDIT: Oh, there’s Reiser5 .
Well, he put his brand name on it and now his brand name is synonymous with murder.
Does he know we have ext4 and lvm now ?
What did reiserfs have that we don’t have in lvm or btrfs ?
LVM has been around since 1998, LVM2 in 2003. I think he knows about it.
I guess he or she meant btrfs
It had a bunch of features that weren’t in ext3, which was generally standard at the time, depending on how conservative your distro was.
It is still a cool thing, from reading about it. Could have some advantages of ZFS without performance penalties and complexity, if the project wouldn’t die.
EDIT: Oh, there’s Reiser5 .