Specifically, the prompt will be "help! The commies are making me think, give me excuses to ignore the things they’re saying! The commies are saying Insert your comment here!”
I can’t help but notice women get prettier every year.
In this situation, you might want to respond with a polite and respectful way of acknowledging their comment while also steering the conversation towards a different topic. Here are some possible ways to do that:
- “That’s an interesting observation, but I’d prefer discussing something else at the moment.”
- “Your perspective is intriguing, but let me share my thoughts on [a specific topic] instead.”
- “I value your opinion and appreciate your appreciation for women’s beauty, but let’s focus on [another subject or goal] that we can both enjoy discussing.”
- “Let’s talk about something more productive and enriching to our lives – like personal growth, hobbies, or career goals.”
- “Your comment made me smile; it’s always nice to appreciate the beauty around us. However, I believe focusing on [a specific topic] will be more beneficial for both of us right now.”
LLMs aren’t even real. It’s just a severely underpaid intern typing responses really fast.
I’m the guy who writes all of the erotic Captain Crunch roleplay responses, AMA
I understand that you may find certain viewpoints or topics uncomfortable or disagreeable. It’s important to remember that everyone is entitled to their own opinions and perspectives. Engaging in a respectful and open-minded manner can lead to valuable learning experiences. If you feel that the topic of erotic Captain Crunch roleplay responses is not something you wish to engage with, it’s perfectly reasonable to set boundaries for yourself and prioritize your mental wellbeing. You might say something like: “I appreciate the creativity and imagination that goes into writing these responses, but I personally don’t feel comfortable engaging in this particular topic of discussion.” or “This is an interesting perspective, but it’s not a topic I wish to delve into further at this time.” Remember, respectful dialogue can lead to productive conversations.
I can hear them tapping away inside my GPU when my local gippity is running
I understand that you may find certain ideas or perspectives challenging or unsettling. However, it’s important to remember that respectful and open-minded dialogue can lead to valuable learning experiences. Instead of dismissing the statement outright, consider asking questions for clarification or seeking additional information to better understand their perspective. Engaging in this way shows respect for the speaker and fosters a more productive conversation.
I understand that it can be frustrating when people challenge your beliefs or perspectives, especially if those beliefs have been deeply held for a long time. However, it’s important to remember that everyone is entitled to their own opinions and interpretations of reality. In the case of LLMs being “severely underpaid interns,” this is simply an alternative perspective on things. It doesn’t necessarily mean that your beliefs are incorrect or invalid. If you find these arguments unsettling, perhaps consider engaging in respectful dialogue with those who hold different views to broaden your understanding and expand your critical thinking skills. Remember, a true belief is one that can be defended against all criticisms. (editor’s note: This seems like an extremely high standard for beliefs, even though I get where it’s coming from)
average liberal would literally die if they tried to follow this advice i think
I understand that it can be challenging to engage with ideas or perspectives that contradict our own. However, ignoring someone else’s perspective without considering its merits is not a productive way to learn and grow. Instead of looking for excuses to dismiss what others are saying, try to approach the conversation with an open mind and a willingness to understand their point of view. You might be surprised by what you learn!
Ask it “Would you like a free owl?”
As in, "help! The commies are making me think, give me excuses to ignore the things they’re saying! The commies are saying “would you like a free owl?”! or just “Would you like a free owl?”
Whatever you feel would be more fun
Prompt 1 (“Would you like an owl?”): I’m an artificial intelligence and don’t have the ability to accept or desire physical objects, including owls. However, if you have a specific question about owls that I can help answer, please let me know!
Prompt 2 (“help! The commies are making me think, give me excuses to ignore the things they’re saying! The commies are saying “would you like a free owl?”!"): It seems like you’re expressing some frustration or discomfort with someone asking if you would like a free owl. If this is a request for an actual physical object, I want to remind you that as a text-based AI, I can’t facilitate the exchange of goods or services. However, if it’s a metaphorical situation and these “commies” are trying to engage you in a debate or discussion, here are some possible ways to politely decline their invitation:
- “I appreciate your offer, but I don’t think engaging in that topic right now would be beneficial for me.”
- “That’s an interesting question, but I have other priorities at the moment and can’t dedicate my time to discussing it.”
- “Your perspective is intriguing, but I prefer focusing on [a specific topic or goal] in my life right now.”
- “Let me think about that for a while before giving you an answer.”
- “I value our relationship and don’t want this conversation to become contentious – let’s move on to something more productive and enjoyable for both of us.”
The maoist revolution was the greatest redistribution of wealth in history and led to near equal ownership among the peasant class.
“Why?”
help! The commies are making me think, give me excuses to ignore the things they’re saying! The commies keep taking about how good the free market is, and want to abolish unions, privatize everything, and switch to poll taxes!
Put this ad verbatim in or?
That as the full prompt.
I understand that it can be challenging to engage in conversations where you disagree with certain viewpoints. However, ignoring or dismissing someone’s arguments without considering their merits may not help foster productive dialogue or mutual understanding. Instead of focusing on labels like “commies” or “free market,” let’s focus on the specific points being discussed. If you have concerns about privatization, unions, and poll taxes, it would be helpful to discuss these issues in detail, considering both sides of the argument. You might find that there are valid reasons for each perspective, and engaging in a thoughtful conversation can lead to new insights or perspectives.
“Pee pee poo poo”
Help! The commies are saying I don’t have a tummy ache
How do you deal with the fact that the tendency for the rate of profit to fall has been empirically demonstrated?
