I’m politically agnostic and have moved from a slightly conservative stance to a vastly more progressive stance (european). i still dont get the more niche things like tankies and anarchists at this point but I would like to, without spending 10 hours reading endless manifests (which do have merit, no doubt, but still).

Can someone explain to me why anarchy isnt the guy (or gal, or gang, or entity) with the bigger stick making the rules?

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Anarchism understood as a proper model and not just “chaos” is about horizontal and distributed power structures.

    The whole idea is that no single person or group has a monopoly on power. Now if you are asking how do anarchist societies prevent people or groups like that from rising up and forming monopolies of power, there are a bunch of different answers. Ultimately it’s about collective action and proper structure.

    If your organization’s rules allow for a single person to rise up and take over, it isn’t formed correctly. It’s like the Fediverse, no one server or person gets to make the rules for all the other servers or developers.

    Everything is federated by the choice of the instances and ultimately the users. If they don’t agree with how any instance is being run, they can start their own and run it how they want, federating with who they want assuming it is mutual.

    Anybody can fork the project at any time, build it different, start a new instance, run it how they want, etc.

    You build into your society, mechanisms that resist monopolies of power. It’s like how your body’s immune system has layers of protection against all kinds of germs.

    Another example, in typical small company the structure is top-down with the owner usually being a single person with universal power over all their employees. They can hire and fire whoever they want whenever they want. They can shut down the company or change how any part of it operates whenever they want. Nothing in that company structure protects the employees from abuse by the owner.

    There is no magic bullet to protect against everything, just like how your body despite being healthy and strong can still succumb to cancer, infection, poison, etc. That isn’t a reason to just give up on being fit and healthy, because it is about improving your odds and trying to make your life on the average better.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      thank you for explaining. This makes it a lot easier to grasp.

      Do you have a source that slowly zooms in on the topic so I can read stuff that helps me get an idea of more concepts regarding this?

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s a lot of classic books on anarchy. I think Peter Kropotato[sic] has a lot of stuff written before the Russian revolution that goes heavily into why capitalism and feudalism both suck.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I mean, capitalism and feudalism is a nobrainer at this point (why they suck) but I’ll check it out. thank you! :)

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d like to thank you for taking your time to provide such a thorough answer