1.“Federal agencies have the authority to intervene in protests, picket signs, or blockades. The law is impartial: it must be enforced without exception.”

2.“Federal forces are not required to have judicial oversight for their actions.”

3.“Forces are not obligated to consider alternative entrances or pathways. If the main path is blocked, their duty is to clear it.”

4.“This action continues until the flow of traffic is fully restored.”

5.“To carry out these acts, forces will use the minimum necessary force, which is sufficient and proportional to the situation they are addressing.”

6.“Instigators and organizers of the protest will be identified.”

7.“Vehicles used in the protest will be identified and subjected to citations or penalties.”

8.“Data of the instigators, accomplices, participants, and organizers will be transmitted to the authorities through appropriate channels.”

9.“Notices will be sent to the judge in cases of damage, such as burning flags.”

10.“In cases involving minors, relevant authorities will be notified, and the guardians of these youths who bring them to these demonstrations will face sanctions and punishment.”

11.“The costs incurred by security operations will be borne by the responsible organizations or individuals. In cases involving foreigners with provisional residency, information will be forwarded to the National Directorate of Immigration.”

12.“A registry will be created for organizations that participate in these types of actions.”

  • Łumało [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 months ago

    And if it helps, you are right, if they’d be at least as willing to test and doubt their ideology

    We are doing that constantly, you are trying to shake parts which already have been set in stone for quite a while and as such this is why you aren’t treated very seriously. You lack knowledge in aspects many of us already posses and are trying to school us on them, this is backwards. If you’d like to shake these foundations you’d need to find some kind of really strong drill.

    Well, my inbox has grown +35 today, and these are only those I’ve been too lazy to answer, so yeah, my attitude is not friendly.

    Eh understandable, but you don’t have to even respond to everyone or continue the cycle of being perpetually mad. You’ve got no else to blame getting into this predicament but yourself.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ah, that’s different. Just a habit of reacting at events. I’m not mad, just bored to death and irritated by that.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Mad in the sense of “being crazy” maybe, but not in the sense of “being very angry”.

          Just a habit of reacting at events.

          I meant that.

          Also the more anxiety some other occupation causes, the more I retreat to shit throwing contests here.

          That’s my reason. What’s yours?

          • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            That’s my reason. What’s yours?

            I’m hungover and it’s fun to shit on you

            I meant that.

            So your habit is to get mad and cry about it? Lmao that’s sad