• star_wraith [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    idk, I have a hard time taking any poll of Americans seriously when it comes to foreign policy in general and Palestine/Israel in particular. Talk to any American for five minutes about the wider world and you’ll quickly realize you may as well be talking to a beagle.

    Even when they are honest and can admit they don’t actually know what’s going on in other countries, they will still feel they are entitled to have an opinion on it and that their opinion is correct.

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      10 months ago

      I guess it depends on the demographics. At my college, there are many black, Hispanic, and Arab students. Almost all of the ones I’ve spoken to are sympathetic towards Palestine.

      White people will be weirder about their stances, because as you said, the ones who don’t understand the problem will still end up taking a side due to vibes. The East/southeast Asians I’ve talked to are usually too focus on securing that Lockheed internship to really care.

    • MattsAlt [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I got on to my mil about Russia Ukraine a month ago, asking if she knew what eumaidan was or knew anything about Crimea or Donbas. Absolutely no knowledge of any, not even an idea which were places or events. She agreed she didn’t know even the basic history and didn’t bring it up the rest of the week. Que thanksgiving and she’s talking about it again, ask again about those 3, still no clue. jokerfied

    • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Ngl sometimes it’s hard to not be mad at every single person over the age of 45 for not murdering at least one fossil fuel exec by now

      This was your responsibility assholes, and now I have to live in the world y’all fucked up

      People older than like 40 need to start making excuses for the lack of terror

        • davi [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          Edit: sorry I just saw you were referring to people over 40, I haven’t had my coffee yet. Gen X I see you I hear you.

          the oldest millennials are 42 this year and 43 next year.

      • GaveUp [love/loves]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m a Zoomer and if you’re talking about the US, communist party membership was literally like 5 times higher in their days than right now

        Boomer bashing is dumb

            • anarchoilluminati [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m sure it does happen but if ‘every’ Boomer has that life then that might have more to do with where you are or who you surround yourself with, including radicals.

              I’ve met a lot of aging Boomer Leftists who are not even homeowners, much less business owners, and barely manage to survive but understand that’s the life they chose for themselves to keep tonsome revolutionary values. Shitting on a whole generation which includes its working class radicals is really misguided, as you said.

        • mar_k [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not saying there aren’t based boomers but that’s not really saying much, isn’t the CPUSA notoriously ass? Most communists have no interest in it

      • anarchoilluminati [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        I know what you mean, but there were a lot of violent revolutionary movements that happened worldwide in which people who are now over the age of 45 were the primary participatory demographic.

        You can be mad at older revolutionaries for not being successful, and even then the anger is perhaps misplaced, but I don’t think it was for lack of trying.

            • TupamarosShakur [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              yeah I usually use a definition putting zoomers at 26. 27/28 would put me in the zoomer category, and although I know I’m in the “not-quite-millenial, not-quite-zoomer” age range, it just feels like I’m slightly closer to the millenials in how I grew up than the zoomers.

              • Smeagolicious [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I can relate (in the z-millennial limbo bracket) as my upbringing was probably more like older millennials in that I didn’t have a lot of access to tech & the internet in my early childhood years (family couldn’t afford it) but I relate much more to zoomers than millennials nowadays tbh.

          • mar_k [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            From what I’ve seen Gen Z is more staunchly pro-Palestine (probably because of being more informed from social media), whereas millennials are more likely to be lukewarm on the whole thing but generically support peace

            Under the same poll, the large majority of 25-34 year olds support a ceasefire, but a big of chunk of those people both support a ceasefire and support Israel. Lot of “Israel has a right to defend itself but Netanyahu has taken things too far” talk from libs like that.

      • timicin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        talk to enough zoomers and you’ll come to understand that anyone older might as well be a boomer.

          • timicin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Maybe the POC ones will save us.

            there aren’t enough of us who can vote to affect any change

    • star_wraith [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      10 months ago

      That 18-34 is brutal

      Yes. Though I would also point out that POC opinion is basically within the margin of error of the same result. Makes me even angrier that people like Juliana Marguiles can say that black folks only support Palestine because they’re brainwashed and feel comfortable walking around in public, and otherwise face zero consequences.

    • timicin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      So how is millenial/genz discontent going to be dealt with?

      i’ve lost track at the number of polls i’ve seen like this throughout the decades as one of the eldest millennials and the biggest take away from every single one is that the ancient adage that we start to track conservatives as we age still mostly holds true. (i’m not sure if i should be glad that i missed the memo).

      if things stay on the same course then political leanings will change; but watching Palestinian support drop from the high 60’s in the late 1990’s/early 2000’s into the mid 40’s today from the millennial cohort and watching genz do the same thing makes me believe that this country will be forced to change before our politics ever do.

            • timicin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              do you have a well respected independent 3rd party that agrees with this or is this your own world view?

            • the_itsb [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m surprised to see this counterfactual argument here and wonder if you’re acquainted with the history of the word:

              Members of this demographic cohort are known as millennials because the oldest became adults around the turn of the millennium. Authors William Strauss and Neil Howe, known for creating the Strauss–Howe generational theory, are widely credited with naming the millennials. They coined the term in 1987, around the time children born in 1982 were entering kindergarten, and the media were first identifying their prospective link to the impending new millennium as the high school graduating class of 2000.

              I remember this very well because I was a member of the class of 2000. 🧓 and yes, I do remember the 80s.

        • timicin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          i’m pretty sure most millennials in this country are still alive

    • bigboopballs [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      So how is millenial/genz discontent going to be dealt with?

      We’ll be liquidated by war, climate change, etc.

      honestly it doesn’t seem like the younger generations will ever engage in organized opposition to Capitalism anyways. I think the social control is too good.

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    Education in this context only means, College vs Not College. It doesn’t mean, educated in world history and politics.

  • GaveUp [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Interesting, I’ve seen other polls with inverse correlation between edu level and pro-Palestine starting from high school diploma to to phd

    50% of college grads approve of Biden’s handling of Israel and Palestine compared to 25% non college grads though lmao

    • Hmm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      On 12 January 1971, the federal government indicted Philip Berrigan and other East Coast antiwar activists on felony charges of plotting to impede the Vietnam War through violent action. The activists’ agenda supposedly included blowing up underground heating pipes in Washington to shut down government buildings, kidnapping presidential adviser Henry Kissinger to ransom him for concessions on the war and raiding draft boards to destroy records and slow down the draft.

      The Justice Department prosecutors chose to hold the conspiracy trial in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, a conservative area where a randomly chosen jury would be heavily against the defendants. However, before the jury was selected at what came to be known as the Harrisburg-7 trial, a group of left-leaning social scientists supporting the defendants interviewed a large number of registered voters in the area to try to figure out how to get a sympathetic jury there. They discovered, among other things that college-educated people were more likely than others to be conservative and to trust the government. Thus, in court, during the three weeks that it took to examine 465 potential jurors and pick a panel of 12, lawyers for the defense quietly favored skilled blue-collar workers and white-collar workers without a lot of formal educations—nonprofessionals, although the sociologists and lawyers apparently never used that term.

      The lawyers were uneasy doing this, however, because it went against their intuition. The notion of closed-minded hard hats and open-minded intellectuals is widespread and is reinforced by mass-media characters like loading-dock worker Archie Bunker and his college-student son-in-law, “pinko” Mike. In fact, All in the Family made its television debut the very day of the Harrisburg indictments, 12 January 1971; by the time the trial and jury selection started, it had been on the air for a year.

      Ignoring these false stereotypes paid off. The government put on a month-long, $2 million extravaganza featuring 64 witnesses, including 21 FBI agents and 9 police officers. The defense called no one to the witness stand. After seven days of deliberation, the jury was not able to reach a unanimous decision, and the judge declared a mistrial; but with 10 of the 12 carefully selected jurors arguing for a not-guilty verdict, the government dropped the case.2

      Blue-collar skeptics? Loyal intellectuals? Was the Harrisburg survey a regional fluke? Look at what the nationwide polls showed at the time. On 15 February 1970 the New York Times reported the results of a Gallup poll on the war in Vietnam.3 Gallup had found that the number of people in sharp disagreement with the government over the war had increased but still constituted a minority. While this increase in opposition was important news, what were particularly interesting were the data on the opinions of subgroups of the population. These numbers announced with striking clarity that those with the most schooling were the most reluctant to criticize the government’s stand in Vietnam. There was a simple correlation (although only in part a cause-and-effect relationship): The further people had gone before leaving school, the less likely they were to break with the government over the war. (See note 3 for the results of the poll.)

      1. New York Times, 13 January 1971, p. 1. Jay Schulman, Phillip Shaver, Robert Colman, Barbara Emrich, Richard Christie, “Recipe for a Jury,” Psychology Today. May 1973, pp.37-44, 77-84; reprinted in Lawrence S. Wrightsman, Saul M. Kassin, Cynthia E. Willis, editors, In the Jury Box, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif. (1987), pp. 13-47. Jack Nelson, Ronald J. Ostrow, The FBI and the Berrigans, Coward, McCann & Geoghegan, New York (1972). William O’Rourke, The Harrisburg 7 and the New Catholic Left, Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York (1972).

      2. New York Times, 15 February 1970, sec. 1, p. 4; or George Horace Gallup, The Gallup Poll, vol. 3, Random House, New York (1972), pp. 2237-2238. The question was worded as follows “Some U.S. senators are saying that we should withdraw all our troops from Vietnam immediately. Would you favor or oppose this?”

                              Favor   Oppose  No opinion
      
      National average        35      55      10
      
      By age group
      21-29 years             39      57       4
      31-49 years             36      56       8
      50 and over             33      53      14
      
      By extent of education
      College                 29      64       7
      High school             34      58       8
      Grade school            44      41      15
      

      From Disciplined Minds: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-battering System That Shapes Their Lives by Jeff Schmidt, Chapter 1 “Timid Professionals”

      Bold emphasis is mine.

      • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        While I absolutely believe this it could not be further from my lived experience. I live in a college town and work at a university, and the politics of people I’m around here range from Hillary Clinton to “let the streets run red with the blood of the bankers” vs my hometown where the average education level is around 8th grade, it’s Trump signs and confederate flags everywhere you look.

        • GaveUp [love/loves]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          You have to adjust for people who grew up and live in the same area

          You’re comparing people from and living in 2 different places

          • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Highly educated people tend to concentrate themselves though. It’s not just that highly educated/non highly educated people from the two locations have different views, there are far less highly educated people in my hometown, and the ones that do exist are irregular as a political group as they’re mostly Indian immigrant doctors.

            It’s hard to compare the views of highly educated vs non-highly educated people only living in the same places, because they live in different places.

            Also notably the people I went to high school with who had more right wing views then were also the ones far more likely to stay in that town and not go to college, vs the ones with more left wing views generally moved for college and never went back, because it’s a rotten conservative backwater and also because there just aren’t jobs for people with college degrees outside of education and healthcare.

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think the “education” part is too relevant tbh. Although they’re not Marxist hubs like republicans portray, campuses tend to have more organizations and students that aren’t strictly adherent to the status quo, so if you’re never exposed to that then you’re likely gonna keep supporting whatever you supported before.