Seriously, there’s no way they didn’t choose that shit on purpose.

  • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Could be some kind of algorithmic pricing, where some machine decides “We noticed people will pay $14.88 more than any other price in the $10-$20 range” and assigns that value by default. Just a self-reinforcing cycle of stupid consumerism.

    • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea I can see this being an extension of some data driven bullshit more than a dog whistle.

      “People think 14.99 is less than 15. Wait now people recognize that as the same let’s go to 14.89 then people will see its not just a cent off. Wait the data says people reaction to the number 9 is an extension of the original trick better go down to 14.88.”

      Not saying it’s definitive but seems more likely than trying to appeal to the festive fascist demographic.

      • fox [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve worked with algorithms that are designed to undercut competitors’ pricing on Amazon and I’ll confirm this isn’t some dog whistle, it’s just a weird outcome of computers trying to undercut each other and maintain marketing tricks in the pricing number.

      • roux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what I think it is. Another store is selling the same thing for 14.99 and Walmart has the overhead to undercut by a few cents. Alot of their stuff is priced at $xx.88.