• LarkinDePark
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    But that’s not a singular scenario. If you want an analogy it would be Russia or China installing nukes on the US-Mexico border and constantly talking shit.

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s the direct comparison to the scenario Russia created when it sent that letter. It’s literally just swapping:

      • The CSTO for NATO
      • America for Russia, as the aggressor with a big military
      • Mexico for Ukraine, as the smaller neighbour that’s not even in the alliance in question

      But let’s not pretend it would be any more just for America to kill hundreds of thousands of Mexicans over nukes stored there. The way America treated Cuba around the time of the missile crisis was basically this, and I would hope that we can agree America was not justified in that. As it is you’re just defending warmongering behaviour because it’s against a side that you don’t like.

      • LarkinDePark
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        But let’s not pretend it would be any more just for America

        Nobody is saying it’s justified. It’s predictable, expected and a normal way for a superpower to behave. You don’t climb into the lion cage and whine about justice when you’re mauled. Russia, the USA, whichever is going to act in its interests and the interests of its security. The unjust part is on the aggressor, in this case the USA in Ukraine funding and arming Nazi extremists to threaten Russia for “its interests in the region” and killing hundreds of thousands because it’s “cheap” and a “good deal” for them.