• explodicle@local106.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bitcoin doesn’t make it OK to get paid just for owning something, it’s just less capitalist than dollars. Miner profits tend towards zero with difficulty adjustment, and Bitcoin doesn’t pay to stake holders at all.

    • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is this not ok to reward those who don’t spend? If we are going to stop climate change we need to stop consuming shit as much as possible

        • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have seen how much Bitcoin spares the environment. I would easily emit 5 times more CO2 if I didn’t put all my money into it

            • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You would have called me arrogant if I served you the logical demonstration. You wouldn’t get it

      • explodicle@local106.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think in this case the distinction between getting a reward and getting paid is important. Bitcoin just appreciates in value with the rest of the economy - you don’t get paid a higher percentage of all bitcoins from saving them - like you do from staking, or holding dollar bonds.

        My criticism here is against capitalism, not against Bitcoin. Bitcoin’s best feature is that it minimizes profits, and inequality caused by the Cantillon effect.