• Bananigans@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is getting reposted everywhere even though people in the comments are constantly giving the correct information on why this happened. Just giving you a heads-up so you’re not to quick to tie your vote to someone else’s willful misunderstanding of the separation of powers.

    • MishMash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      There were funds appropriated for a portion of the wall in 2019 by Trump with the requirement that construction is completed by the end of 2023. Biden asked congress to reappropriate the funds, as he does not have the power to do so, and congress refused. His hands are mostly tied here from what I understand.

      • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn’t do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president?

        • the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah Congress didn’t tie his hands and force him to override laws (which by the acts definition should only be invoked to protect the nation against threats).

          He could just add easily declare his hands tied by the 26 laws he is instead breaking. He could say the wall’s completion wouldn’t do anything to enhance national security (something i recall libs saying when it was trumps wall).

          This is a lie, plain and simple.

        • sik0fewl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not defending it, since I’m not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he’s done it.

      • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        hahahahahahaha “the man in charge of the country and the political party in power have no say! they have to do the incredibly evil thing! the money couldn’t just sit there and not get used, that would be a worse sin than putting up barbed wire and machine gun nests”