• SuperDuper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    9 months ago

    Twitter wasn’t even worth $44B when he paid $44B for it. Hence why the board jumped on the offer. Musk didn’t even think it was worth that much, hence why he tried to weasel his way out of the deal after the board called his bluff.

    • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      His problem wasn’t offering the deal, his problem was saying yes after they called his bluff

      He like… actually legally agreed to it before he looked into it at all. What a fucking dumbass

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        He’s rich enough that stupidity has no consequences for him.

        He has literally made a $40b mistake, still rich enough to not learn a lesson from it.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Now let’s be fair here; Russia and SA made a $40 billion mistake with their purchase candidate selection

        • Sarcastik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The people who deliver themselves into thinking this was strategic or a “4d chess move” are the same moronic Stans that enabled the emperor has no clothes scenario.

  • Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    9 months ago

    This was intentional, he and some wealthy donors wanted to tank the company to stop the spread of left wing populist movements like the Arab spring

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I really can’t believe that Elon is willing to make himself the heal and devalue his “brand” for this wild conspiracy theory shit. He’s just a narcissistic, autistic, wealthy, douchebag. It’s the obvious and most reasonable explanation. He’s so delusional he didn’t realize how horrible his ideas are.

      • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        9 months ago

        Its likely that Musk was a useful idiot in this situation. He backed himself into a corner w/ his dumb tweets and ended up being on the hook for the purchase of twitter. Then he either needed to pay a billion dollar fine or buy twitter. Thats when arab oil money volunteered to fund his blunder likely because it was a win-win for them. They either make money off of the success if twitter gets better, have huge influence over trends if twitter remained the default information platform, or deter future expensive rebellions if twitter was decimated.

        Musk’s idiocy gave dictators their opportunity to deal a deft blow to their largest enemy, information, and he probably just thinks that he’s a genius who earned that investment.

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin @feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        His brand has reached cult status. He could snap newborn babies’ necks like twigs in Times Square and someone would praise him for his basedness.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Do you have, like, evidence of this, or is it just plausible sounding vibes?

      I imagine Twitter being pretty left-leaning was one factor, but I think you also have to consider things like Elon simply being the world’s biggest egotist and also very stupid, and most banks being able to see that this would be a terrible investment.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          Damn, I’ve been keen to say this mindset is simply giving Elon too much credit, but this article drops some pretty strong bits and pieces indeed.

          Definitely feels like Elon is still bumbling through this “plan”, but the evidence is pretty damning.

          Interested to hear more takes on this article. Thanks for sharing!

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The best plans are the ones where you gain an advantage whether it succeeds or fails. For Musk’s fascist backers, him buying Twitter was such a plan: if he successfully turns it into a right-wing disinformation platform they win, and if he destroys it utterly they also win.

      • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Hanlon’s Razor

        None of us will know the full story for a long time, but it seems likely Elon was a useful idiot that his backers knew would be like letting a bull lose in a China shop. Not that Twitter was not problematic in a lot of ways, but its sort of decentralized communication did make things harder for despotic assholes for a bit

        • Uranium3006@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          People act like twitter is somehow unique and irreplaceable. In reality with the rise of the fediverse breaking the network effect couldblet a genie out of the bottle they can’t put back: decentralized communication that isn’t beholden to corperate entities easily pressured by governments

        • badelf@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I believe you’re underestimating him. An idiot, he’s not. It all kind of fits with Musk rolling over on Ukraine. He always has some weak excuse for all his actions. Because the US public believes lies, he gets away with it.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s a theory that doesn’t make much sense to me. If he wanted to censor protests, blowing up twitter is counterproductive because now people will go elsewhere. Anyone can just make a website for $5/mo

  • Cheers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I still say he named it X because he planned on killing it. Fuckwad Musk was a Trumper and only quit because Trump had a bigger ego.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      9 months ago

      He named it X because he’s a puerile man child that wanted PayPal to be X.com before Peter Thiel forced him into being a billionaire, kicking and screaming, and he’s never really gotten over it.

      • Cheers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What’s easier to believe? He made a terrible financial decision and consistently made worse decisions to make one of the worlds largest social media platforms into the ground or he just an immature man child that has no goal other than to be edgy?

        • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think it’s easier to believe that powerful people saw it as an opportunity to control a popular social space for controlling discourse and dissent. Western folks might not think of it much, but social media did some good before. One Egyptian dude even named his daughter Facebook. Some of these places still have literal kings.

          I think there’s a 3rd option that he knows he’s making it shitty and horrible and it is on purpose and was the goal. Maybe not always. It might have started as stupid posturing, but it seems like there’s goals now and there’s buy in from authoritarian parties.

        • puppy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          He made a terrible financial decision and consistently made worse decisions to make one of the worlds largest social media platforms into the ground

          If you ask “why though?”, you arrive at your second hypothesis. There’s no “or” between them.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    For as much of a genius that he thinks he is, why didn’t he do literally nothing after he comes on board and watch how twitter functions first before he starts firing people? Wouldn’t you want hire more people instead if you want to implement new features for the super app he is dreaming of?

    Hey, if this level of decision making is all it takes to become a tech CEO, maybe I should become a tech CEO if this acting thing doesn’t work out for some reason. Seems pretty easy.

    • Knightfox@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again, but Elon really isn’t that smart and he certainly isn’t a genius. Elon has a BA in Physics from a school known for business degrees. He also got a BS in Business, but UPenn and Wharton are known more for how hard it is to get in than how hard the classes are.

      The website CollegeVine says UPenn is known as the “Social Ivy” and “UPenn’s admissions is highly-selective, but students applying to the UPenn College of Arts & Science (CAS) will find it less academically competitive than schools like Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Stanford (although exceptional academics are still a must).”

      By the way, he started college in 1990, transferred to UPenn in 1992, and states he graduated in 1995, but UPenn refutes that saying he graduated in 1997. This is a school where 96% of those who are accepted graduate within 150% of the degree time (4 year degree within 6 years) (https://www.collegetuitioncompare.com/edu/215062/university-of-pennsylvania/graduation/).

      Musk of course says he completed the courses in 1995, but there was some sort of mixup with an English and History credit that delayed the degree by 2 years.

      I’m typically not one to judge what degrees someone pursues or how long they take to finish those degrees, but when people start calling someone who loses $40 billion a genius the gloves come off.

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        IDK how helpful words like “smart” and “genius” are as predictors of academic success anyway.

        A wise person studies consistently and conscientiously and gets good grades. A wise & wealthy person would also hire people to have great ideas for them and be frank in telling them how terrible their own ideas are.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ego! He is absolutely convinced he’s a genius and smarter than everyone else. People sniffing his farts and praising him are not helping either. There’s only one thing Musk is good at and that’s riding top of the Dunning-Kruger wave.

    • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because only a nutjob like him would have the ego for it. Sometimes reckless people are granted money and you end up with dumpster fires like musk.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m convinced that he “made the best out of a bad situation” once he realized he couldn’t get out of the acquisition.

      He’s not doing any of this for any other reason than trying to destroy one of the largest platforms for leftist voices in the U.S./world. He’s pretty successfully accomplishing his goal, with that frame of mind.

  • Chuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s Twitter. I refuse to play the name game and lend an inch of support for such a stupid decision. It’s not that I even use it. Just the point of it

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It always fascinates me how there are people who come into this community to complain about the constant mentions of Shitbird Supreme.

      I mean, look at the community name, and if it bothers you, ban it from your feed.

      • Mudface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Are you telling me this isn’t the technology community??

        Who looks at community names anyways, I’m just scrolling All like the chad I am, posting wherever I want, never reading the community rules.

        The way God intended

        • thefartographer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          On the fourth day, God made Lemmy and He saw that it was good.

          On the fifth day, God made Elon Musk and He saw that it was bad. Really bad. So bad that he made Nazis so that Elon Musk would look less bad in comparison, but then Elon joined them instead and gave them a louder microphone.

          “Holy shit!” said God and He went back to making other humans, but a shitty little piece of Elon was still stuck in the mold and God kept accidentally making other shit-humans, like Roy Cohn, that professor who did the university prison experiment, and finally got out the last piece of shit and named that one Carrot Top.

          God was so ashamed that He decided to go take a depression-nap. He still needed a way to cover up the mess He made, so He gave children the ability to get cancer and went to sleep. And to this day, still He sleeps soundly to the cacophony of everyone crying out for help to escape the living hell that we live in, populated by a bunch of shitty cartoonish villains.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Musk is a shitty businessman and an even shittier person. But those valuations are all nonsense and mostly based on potential growth, not current fundamentals. When interest rates go up, investment dries up and estimations of potential growth plummets.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Musk is a shitty businessman and an even shittier person. But those valuations are all nonsense and mostly based on potential growth,

      Did you read the article? They estimated the valuation by their ad revenue, comparing before and after the take over. It’s still a shitty valuation, but it’s not like there’s a lot else to go by.

      not current fundamentals.

      What do you mean by current fundamentals? It’s a private service provider, there’s not enough source material to evaluate for a fundamental analysis.

      When interest rates go up, investment dries up and estimations of potential growth plummets

      Right, but that’s static across the market. You wouldn’t have a situation where interest rates would drive the valuation of a single service provider compared to others in the same market.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    How to lose forty billion in a year

    By Elon Musk

    When this dude’s column for the paper comes out we’re all going to have egg on our faces.