• treefrog@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Guns are already taxed under 2A.

    Taxing them more is legal as long as the taxes aren’t so high that it infringes on rights.

    In other words a 5 or 10% tax wouldn’t violate 2A but a 1000% tax certainly would.

    If you still don’t believe guns are taxable, refer to sales tax.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Whoa now! I never said they couldn’t/shouldn’t be taxed. But we OK with a 200% markup on that tax?

      California will double the taxes on guns and ammunition

      This law serves two purposes:

      Be seen to be “doing something”, always a winner. Tack on “for the children”, a tack conservatives are winning with.

      More taxes on the poor. And that’s really the meat of it. It’s appalling how liberals (and I include myself in that definition) are quick to defend the poor, but abhor the notion of them defending themselves.

      Further reading:

      https://imgur.com/eUseWqC

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Rather a 200% increase is reasonable depends on current taxes.

        It’s 11%. Which would increase the current cost of a 9mm round from. .48 to about.53 cents.

        They used 200% to get you wound up just like you’re trying to bait me with all the “but the poor!” nonsense.

        It’s 5 cents.