A judge dismissed all charges Tuesday against a Philadelphia police officer who fatally shot a driver last month.

Mark Dial shot 27-year-old Eddie Irizarry through the rolled-up driver’s side window of Irizarry’s sedan during a traffic stop on Aug. 14.

Dial and his partner, Officer Michael Morris, say they had been pursuing Irizarry for driving erratically and turning the wrong way down a one-way street. Morris testified that Irizarry had a knife in his hand and had started to raise it as the officers approached.

During a hearing, Dial’s lawyers argued he acted in self-defense because he believed the knife Irizarry had was a gun. Brian McMonagle, one of his lawyers, said his client was justified in shooting as he was trying to take cover and had feared for his life during the incident.

“Every tragedy is not a crime,” McMonagle said.

Initial statements from the police department said Dial shot the driver outside the vehicle after he “lunged at” police with a knife, but the department later walked back these statements.

Still, McMonagle said the charges, which included manslaughter, official oppression and four other counts, never should have been filed given the evidence.

“I agree with you 100 percent,” Judge Wendy Pew responded before tossing all charges Tuesday, per the Associated Press.

  • skweetis@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What the actual fuck?! When I read this story a month ago I was furious because they claimed he was out of the car and lunging at them with a knife when they shot him through a closed car window. Mistaking someone for being out of the car and lunging at you when they are inside the car with the window rolled up is not the same as (claiming to) think a knife is a gun. So, you get to lie about what you were scared about and then revise your lie to something more plausible later on? So much fucking bullshit.

    Also, it should be noted that the police only “walked back” the statement about him being out of the car when the family went door to door and found ring cam footage that he was in the car. And they had to do this because the police wouldn’t share body camera footage with the family.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Every tragedy is not a crime,” McMonagle said defending a criminal murderer who totally done did a criminal murder.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How is it possible that there is zero legal consequence for this: “Initial statements from the police department said Dial shot the driver outside the vehicle after he “lunged at” police with a knife, but the department later walked back these statements.”

      I highlight this because I would struggle to think of a controversial case where video confirmed police statements about what happened (the only one I can think of is that poor young girl with the knife in Ohio), but time after time after time we see police statements later proven to be blatant falsehoods and it seems to not matter whatsoever. (Walter Scott is the first example that penetrated my consciousness, but I know there have been many more.)

      Why is there no consequence (ever, as far as I can tell) for police fabrication of events?

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        because cops have a literal history of rioting and murder when you try to hold them accountable.

        So the only time anything ever gets done is when its caught on 3rd party camera and creates so much ruckus that the police officer is sacrificed to protect the greater corruption of the department and their political pawns.

      • Johanno@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It seems like the US is not a state of democracy anymore. Because if the law does not include the law enforcement you basically only one step away from dictatorship or similar.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If a police officer can’t tell the difference between a knife and a gun, they shouldn’t be a police officer.

    • blueeggsandyam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is worse than that. They can’t tell if a person is inside a car or outside a car lunging at them. They clearly lied to cover up their incompetence. This person should not be a cop.

    • MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      No one should be (unless they want to violently uphold a white supremacist system while pretending they are “protecting” people).

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    Initial statements from the police department said Dial shot the driver outside the vehicle after he “lunged at” police with a knife, but the department later walked back these statements.

    Departments lying about officer-involved shootings should be a separately-prosecutable crime.

      • Instigate@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d call it Gross Misconduct in Execution of Government Duties - minimum sentence is a permanent dismissal from all government roles (at all levels) along with a major fine that can be taken from a government pension fund and goes directly to victims. Aggravating circumstances (lying about the death of a civilian, multiple lies compounded upon one another etc.) should come within minimum jail time. Cops should always be afraid of saying or doing the wrong thing. Only then do we get them on their best behaviour.

  • Otakulad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope any person who has to go to trial and this officer is called as a witness uses this as an example as to why they arent a good witness.

    “Officer, in 2023 you fatally shot a man after you said he got out of his car and lunged at you with a knife. You later backtracked on this and said he was in his car with the windows up. How can we trust what you have to say if you can’t remember what happened then?”

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s actually a registry of cops who have been shown to lie so that their testimony can be disregarded. I hope there’s someone out there who makes this happen for this cop.

  • SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m curious if there’s a similar situation where a civilian shot an officer because he was scared for his life and ended being dismissed in court for self defense.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do think theres been one or two cases where cops executed a warrant on the wrong house, and the home owner defended themselves, and not only survived but was found to have done no wrong, but I cant find the magic word combination to find anything but innumerable news stories about charges being dropped against cops.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          50
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Remember.

          Cops can be terrified, hyper reactionary cowards who jump to lethal force over every imagined crinkle of leaves, and we must have understanding about how hard things are for them.

          Bu non-police must be calm, collected, highly trained, vigilant and absolutely stoic in the most extreme, and must execute a detailed 5 page analysis on the situation before they can dare to act, because they should know better.

  • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Growing up, I thought “street justice” would be more of a thing. Apparently people don’t take an eye for an eye.

    fuck that judge, fuck that cop

  • who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Keep denying justice to people and they will start to take it upon themselves to see it done. I personally don’t want to see lynch mobs, but if a few pigs have to swing for them to get the message they brought it on themselves