• MoonManKipper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    If your job really can be done as well 100% from home (as many people insist) then you’ve got a problem - because that means it can be done as well 100% from home by some onefrom India or similar and they’ll be cheaper. Be careful what you wish for.

    I’m of the view that actually this isn’t true for a lot of jobs, particular anything that involves interacting in a team, just people wish it was.

    • Oneobi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s not the job tho, it’s the competence and calibre of the individual.

      I spend far too much time unpicking poor workmanship from outsourced colleagues.

      You pay peanuts, you get what?

      • MoonManKipper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Exactly - it’s the calibre and competence - and implicit in your comment is the idea the person from India isn’t as good. This isn’t my experience- I know plenty of amazing engineers from India. And it’s not outsourcing if they’re employed by the company- it’s just the job currently done by you.

        • Oneobi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You, my friend, need to introduce me to these people.

          The bright sparks don’t hang around.

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      My job can be done 100% remotely. While in office I am “remote”, because team is displaced among different cities.

      If an Indian can do better than me, it’s fair, they can take it. I am not racist. If my company outsource my job in India to save money, I am happy I won’t be working there anymore. A company that value a quick, short term saving over its employees is a bad company. They’d have anyway to re insource my position in 5 years anyway, we know how this things work

      • MoonManKipper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not outsourcing if they’re employed by your company, just remote working - they’ll be the employee and the company can care for them as much. They’ll just be more productive because of lower cost of living where they happen to live. If your job can be done fine 100% why would they ever change it back? Remote working isn’t the same as insource/outsource

        • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          If they can do that, with better results than what I can offer, I am fine with that. Good luck to all people involved. I’ll survive.

          To be fair they could already do it. As said we are all “remote” among offices. They have never done it. And I am not afraid for my position.