There was previously discussion about Russell Brand denying allegations that were to be shown in a TV documentary, and now things are developing.
There was previously discussion about Russell Brand denying allegations that were to be shown in a TV documentary, and now things are developing.
What about a Woody Allen movie? The same applies. These people are actors pretending to be someone else, and during those two hours, we suspend disbelief and accept them as that other person. That is the whole premise of acting.
You might as well proactively swear off all forms of media, as someone involved in the production of every movie, tv show, song, or book has very likely done something that would make the content unworthy of consumption in your eyes.
I like to separate the person from the work, especially work from the past. People are flawed, but a movie or performance can still be good.
There are movies I’ve watched recently that would never be made today, at least not with some of the dialog in them. I don’t say to myself, “I really would have loved this movie, but they made some ableist comments, so I can never watch it again and now hate it.” I accept the movie for what it was and when it was made and recognize that a couple jokes, or actions in someone’s personal life, don’t need to take away from the whole, which is the film.
For many people his movies became unwatchable because of his absurd behavior. The physical movie was unchanged, it’s cultural existence was revised from the future.
Cultural evolution can change all sorts of cultural artifacts. Not always in a negative way either.
Here’s another clear example, (also negative) Gone With the Wind morphed from beloved classic to unwatchable racist nonsense.
Cultural artifacts are not static entities frozen in time.
I guess we can agree to disagree.