I was thinking about this after listening to Marc Andreassen blather on about how he doesn’t trust government as a repository of trusted keys and other functions. He advocates for private companies to perform critical functions. Standard libertarian stuff in many respects.

The problem of course is that corporations lack accountability. They can shift terms and conditions or corporate purpose and there is little meaningful recourse except to stop using them. I can think of small examples that don’t widely resonate (Mountain Equipment Co-op I’m thinking of you 🤬) but are there big examples that I’m missing?

  • Dr. Bob@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The accountability is both legal and electoral. Neither is necessarily easy, but this is dramatically different than the legal framework that applies to corporations.

    I don’t want to clog up the thread with examples, but you don’t need to search too hard to find examples of minor harms that aren’t worth any individuals time to sue.

    Class actions are supposed to be the antidote but wind up enriching the filing lawyers and the named plaintiff. Everyone else gets a coupon for $1.27 off their next purchase.

    • Dr. Bob@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s one I just ran across shortly after writing this.

      Booz Allen is a private company that runs recreation.gov and sets it’s own fees to pay itself.

      Somebody sued and won saying that fees charged for access to national parks were meant only for park maintenance and therefore the fees were illegal. They won! And then…nothing.

      Technically everyone who paid a booking fee to access an American National park in the last decade is entitled to a refund. Not a penny appears to be forthcoming because fuck you, that’s why.

      https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/why-is-booz-allen-renting-us-back