• Dragon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 years ago

      Has it been tried? it might require re-thinking how search engines work. If the databases were all formatted consistently, it seems possible.

      • tuna@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 years ago

        There’s Yacy. It worked ok when I was running it locally, but the moment I connected it to the rest of the network my search results were dominated by porn and spam sites.

        • Dragon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 years ago

          Search engines are incredibly conplex. the problem might not be decentralization, but just proper investment and development.

          • tuna@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 years ago

            the problem as I understand it is that with yacy you request relevant results from peers in addition to your own local DB. but that makes it really easy for spammers to keyword-stuff results and push their sites to the top.

            I’m not sure how we can trust random people to give you search results without being overrun by spam.

      • someone@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yes, there is YaCy. And it sucks. It brings like 10 results in single word searches, usually none of which are relevant. When you write a sentence of sorts it just freezes.

    • ufra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 years ago

      Backend is implied here (quasi-decentralised frontends can be great), and agreed it’s incredibly valuable to have a central index of content, rankings, answers. Maybe it can be overcome by advances in data transfer speeds and some talent taking interest in the project (for example, would centralised search be used on Mars?)