Prosecutors are moving aggressively because the plea deal fell apart. But why did it fall apart?

  • steebo_jack@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well definitely not voting for Hunter…ANYWAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYs…whats everyone having for dinner?

      • steebo_jack@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Soy? You vegetarian? I tried the impossible burger one time but wasnt for me…

        Someone actually mentioned the soy chicken nuggets a while back but i could never find it at the local supermarket…

        • Fal@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          You sure you had impossible and not beyond? Beyond is gross, but impossible is almost indistinguishable

          • steebo_jack@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Had it at counter…they call it the impossible burger …it wasnt terrible but compared to beef it was overly crunchy and don’t have the oozing fat dripping off of it…also way too salty for some reason…if there were no more cows in earth I can see it being a replacement though…

            • Fal@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Crunchy? Wtf? It sounds like that was just a bad burger. You’re right they don’t drip with grease and fat. But otherwise if done right you would have a hard time telling the difference

  • Can_you_change_your_username@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    For anyone wondering, the plea deal fell apart because the judge asked if the plea deal meant that Hunter couldn’t be charged for related past crimes and the prosecutor said no while Hunter’s attorney said yes. The judge didn’t accept it because they had different understandings of the plea deal and they were not successful in renegotiating the deal.

    • noride@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It was the other way around. Hunter’s team believed it would prevent future charges and the prosecution did not.

      • June@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No it was the other way around. The prosecution believed it would not prevent future charges and Hunter’s team did.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    And congressional Republicans have been hoping to connect Hunter’s money to corrupt conduct from Joe Biden, though they haven’t succeeded in proving any such thing yet.

    In July, Weiss’s team presented their plea deal with Hunter before a judge — who refused to accept it, telling both sides to clarify some of its provisions after a dramatic public hearing.

    Hunter had a messy divorce from his wife, who would later accuse him in a court filing of “spending extravagantly” on “drugs, alcohol, prostitutes, strip clubs, and gifts for women with whom he has sexual relations.” He began dating Beau’s widow Hallie, in what proved to be a tumultuous and ultimately short-lived relationship.

    Many long probes into purported corruption end this way, with a false statement on a federal form — with something clear and written down, rather than something murky and hard to establish.

    If the main reason is simply that, due to political pressure from Republicans and embarrassment over the IRS officials’ claims, Weiss’s team got cold feet on a deal they’d agreed to — that wouldn’t make them look so great.

    If the main reason is instead that, due to confusion or incompetence on his team, he belatedly concluded the initial deal with Hunter had been far too generous — well, that wouldn’t make him look so great either.


    The original article contains 906 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 76%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • June@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Willing to bet they’re hoping to use Hunter to find something on Biden that they can impeach for that’s completely unrelated to the case, a la Monica Lewinsky and Bill Clinton.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      You know those scenes in a spy movie where the bad guys start torturing the hero, but he just takes it? Then they threaten the hero’s family and he immediately concedes. “Joe, just announce that you won’t seek a second term, and I’m sure we can find a pre-trial diversion program for Hunter.”

      • tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Prosecution should have kept the plea deal. They probably won’t be able to secure an actual conviction because they don’t have shit on Hunter Biden.

        He used drugs and owned a gun? Ok…

        He didn’t pay $100k in taxes but then actually did go back and pay it? Ok…

        Who the fuck goes to jail for that? Nobody.

        On the other hand. Broadly gestures toward Trump family and associates

  • Mellow12@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    He is being charged with a federal felony in the United States District court of Delaware for lying on a Federal form.

    I’m more interested in them following the money from Ukraine and China, but I guess it’s easier to hit him with a charge that us poors could just as easily fall foul of.

    The President can grant a pardon to a person who was convicted in a United States District Court, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, or a military court-martial. Generally, a pardon is an expression of forgiveness. A pardon can help eliminate some of the consequences of a conviction.

    There is a less than zero chance that he will be held accountable anyway.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      How many times did Jared lie on his SF-86 before his father-in-law said “fuck it, give him a clearance anyway”? And talk about following the money… oh boy.

      • Mellow12@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        You seem to misunderstand me. I don’t give a shit about which side you cheer for. Corruption is corruption. Prosecute them both if they are guilty, but this article is about the Biden family, and that’s what I am leaving a comment about.

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The article is about Hunter being prosecuted for guns and drugs, an entirely personal matter. You decided to complain that it’s not bringing Joe down for some other nonsense that never happened and speculation about pardons. That doesn’t exactly scream good faith discussion.

    • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      As far as the republican lead investigation has shown Hunter has received no money or bribe form anyone and, since I don’t think ALL republicans are complete morons, expecially in cases where they do have vast interests at stake, I tend to think that this should be the case.

      Would they have found definitive proofs of bribery or of foreign agents paying dues to Hunter for any kind of return I think we would have seen them in the open but, since this has not been the case, I think I can fairly certainly ascertain that Hunter has received nothing in return for nothing.

      But if you want to cling to the idea that he has sold anything to a foreign government while not holding any office in the USA government hey, you do you. Keep wearing your tinfoil hat and have a great life 👍🏻👍🏻