Ukraine’s National Corruption Prevention Agency added major food corporations PepsiCo and Mars to the “international sponsors of war” list on Sept. 1.

      • hypelightfly@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t see why it would. It’s not like they’re in a position to not buy from wherever they can.

          • hypelightfly@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            It doesn’t affect it one way or the other. What does is their continuing operations in Russia, who started and is continuing the war.

                • zephyreks@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Because China (and Mexico, India, Southeast Asia, South America, Africa, and the Middle East) have not really introduced sanctions (except against military equipment)? These companies are following their government’s policy, which is more than can be said for companies like PepsiCo and Mars (both American).

                  International trade is dictated by countries, not by companies. If a company is breaking the policy of the country it operates from, that’s obviously very bad. These companies aren’t trying to pick sides: their government hasn’t picked a side and so there is no reason for the company to.

      • DrM@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If you buy a drone for lets say 1000$ from Xiaomi via AliBaba, 100$ of those go to AliBaba maybe 1$ goes to Russia. from the 900$ left for Xiaomi, 600 are gone for the production. 300 left, 3 go to Russia. 4$ for Russia. But if this drone helps invalidate only one russian soldier, that 4$ are easily worth 100000$. If it helps invalidate a tank, it goes to the millions. Thats easily worth it if there is no alternative

      • jcg@halubilo.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Franklin Clarence Mars (/ˈmɑːrz/; September 24, 1883 – April 8, 1935) was an American business magnate who founded the food company Mars, Incorporated, which mostly makes chocolate candy. Mars’ son Forrest Edward Mars developed M&M’s and the Mars bar. He is also widely believed to be the god of war.

  • wAkawAka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    “international war sponsor” what a nice title, I think every company operating in US should have it!

    • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      FYI: the “the” before Ukraine is superfluous. You can just type “like Ukraine just accused you of.”

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, no. They can earn millions with Russia, so they do. Spend half on that in good PR, and you still earned millions in blood money.

      And if people get pissed? The news cycle means they’ll forget about this in about 3 days so you’re good

    • AssholeDestroyer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pepsi has a history in Russia. They once traded the USSR soda in exchange for a fleet of naval ships. IIRC at the time Pepsi had the 4th largest navy in the world. They sold the ships to Norway.

  • 30mag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Over the first year of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Russian division of PepsiCo increased its net profit by 333% compared to 2021, reaching $525 million, and paid over $115 million to the state budget, according to the report.

    That is a little suspicious.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This explains why LinkedIn was sending out surveys today asking “What do you think about PepsiCo?”, “What are the top reasons you would want to work at PepsiCo?”, to a bunch of people. The whole thing was extremely weird, and obviously a PR campaign

        • BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Is being toxic a requirement for joining hexbear? It sure seems like it.

          • 新星 [they/them/🏳️‍⚧️]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Hexbear’s been isolated for a while, and their site developed a culture of trashing on people who “debate” in bad faith, as well as some other stuff like PPB which is weird especially for outsiders.

            If you’re browsing internal Hexbear posts, you’ll find lots of posts under irony which make them perhaps difficult to appreciate. I’d recommend visiting Lemmygrad first.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            They are easily riled and while I doubt there is intentional coordination in place, due to their fervour, they can come across like a brigade. If you speak up against them - cue the hexbears flocking to this comment no doubt - they can get quite vicious, as my comment history will witness.

      • Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Increasingly, “tankies” seem to cover any infraction against the approved anti-russian fervor;

        • if you are not convinced Russia blew up Nord Stream
        • if you are not convinced that Russia blew up a farmer and a tractor in Poland
        • if you are not convinced that Ukraines summer offensive is going all that well
        • if you believe normal Russian people are not evil monsters
        • if you are not convinced that Putin ordered the downing of Prigozhins plane
        • set_secret@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          so given 90% of the planet believe normal Russian people aren’t evil monsters, the default position is tankies?

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          I have been called one just for being critical of the US military, it’s a catch all term for anyone that isnt strictly for capitalist imperialism. I consider it a soft resurgence of the red scare, I cringe each time I see it just like when I see the term lib.

          Both the pro Russian and the pro america-no-matter-the-cost crowds just stink of stupidity imo

        • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Not really. It’s someone who claims to be liberal or progressive or a way left thinker willing to use force to make the world what they want

          People who diminish or refute Tiananmen Square 1989 are tankies

          • twelve20two @slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s original definition doesn’t include liberals. I consider myself relatively left. I’ve had people ridicule some of my viewpoints for being too liberal (I guess too center for them). Those people were tankies, but they weren’t tankies because they’re more left than me. It’s because they consider themselves to be very left leaning while still praising authoritative regimes and being apologists for them. That’s the tank part. They’re alright with military dictatorships of the past and even consider them to have been successful. They also rarely are able to admit the flaws of those regimes (including the genocides), and even if they do, there’s a “reason” for it (X might have been bad and did this, but at the same time, it also did Y which was somewhat good)

          • 🏳️‍⚧️Edward [it/its]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            This is the problem with “tankie”, nobody can actually define it.

            You, attempting to refute that it’s “woke” but for liberals, proved that it is “woke” for liberals.

            • 新星 [they/them/🏳️‍⚧️]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              attempting to refute that it’s “woke” but for liberals

              The best refutation is that woke is “woke” for liberals, but Americans fail to recognize both of their parties are liberals.

    • sneezymrmilo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Man disappointing seeing how many companies I recognize on that list. Boycotting all these companies would be difficult considering how a lot of the companies on here own 20+ brands.

      • root_beer@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        There’s a reason they say that there is no ethical consumption under capitalism. This isn’t to say we should just throw our hands up and give in, but do whatever the hell you can.

        For instance—sorry if you already know to do this—it may not apply for a lot of these companies, in that the goods are consumed, but whenever you can, buy secondhand to reduce not just waste, but also profits for whoever produces the product you buy. Also, sorry if it sounds trite, but I like to think that every little step helps in some way.