• bane_killgrind@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Being 17, I’d attribute some of the blame to her parents or whomever owns that vehicle.

    Is driving recklessly really the only symptom of being this emotionally deregulated? Did they not know how stupid or mentally ill she is?

    I bet the adults around her did not care or excused her behaviour.

    • SharkEatingBreakfast@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s fine, but she still made a conscious decision to do it. If she was one year older, would that make any kind of difference?

      And let me be clear: mental illness can make some behaviors more understandable, but not murder– if the blame is put solely on mental illness, all that does is put more stigma on it. Not every shitty decision people make is because of “mental illness”.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why only murder? Why not rape or assault or abuse or any number of different crimes deeply mentally ill people commit on the regular that ruin lives far more deeply than the death of a loved one?

      • DanTilDawn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are throwing your galaxy brain logic at grieving people looking for an end to destruction and shaming them about it. Just chill with the reactionary soup. nobody is going to feel empowered to drive into a brick wall because of what they said

        • SharkEatingBreakfast@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure you know what the word “reactionary” means if you think that my comments and opinions were “reactionary”.

          The family can grieve, and my opinion has no bearing on the outcome of whatever happens. My point was, in the end, no matter what the reason, there needs to be consequences for someone who killed people, regardless of what the grieving parties think. I don’t think that’s particularly radical.

          It’s a sad and awful situation al around. I can see why those poor families just want to move on.