• telllos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    The need for the 2nd amendment is fundamental if you want the people, able to form a tyranny… oh wait…

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The problem is they don’t see the hypocrisy. They think tyranny only applies to the government.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Generally yeah most tyranny definitions refer to government. It’s hard to exert tyrannical rule without being a de facto government.

    • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Turns out they have always been pro tyranny as long it’s their guy hurting the “correct” people…

    • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You couldn’t be more wrong Telllos. If I didn’t have this gun, the King of England could just walk in here any time he wants and start shoving you around. Do you want that? (Pokes Telllos) Huh? (Shoves Telllos) Do ya!?