Telegram is just actually superior in terms of features I don’t get it.

  • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why does anyone choose Telegram or WhatsApp over Signal which is encrypted and audited? (Probably features I don’t care about, but they do)

    • akulium@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Telegram let’s you send 2gb files, and stores them forever. Signal has a 100mb limit.

      It also used to be easier to set up on multiple devices at the same time, but I believe that Whatsapp and Signal have improved that by now too.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure the file limitations are much of a factor when 100mb covers most files that would need to be sent through a messaging service. There are plenty of dedicated services for sharing larger files.

        • akulium@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mentioned it because it was an annoying limitation for me. 100mb is not a lot for media and zip files nowadays. And I don’t know any good free services that will work more conveniently than simply sending with Telegram, suggestions welcome.

          • Viatorem
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why would you text someone a zip? I always send any files like that over email, I recommend ProtonMail for security but what do I know

          • claymore@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            https://toffeeshare.com/ is what I usually use for big files. But both sender and receiver need to be online for the whole transfer. It doesn’t store anything you send on their servers, but that’s a feature for me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s the point tho, it negates the need for dedicated services for sharing larger files

            • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago
              1. It’s encrypted, just not E2E encrypted

              2. A lot of the time the files i’m sending are game clips or parts of Youtube videos. i want good quality above privacy

      • asudox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As long as your messages are end-to-end encrypted, I don’t know why you would care about that. It’s proven that they do not collect any metadata that could harm your privacy and most of their stuff is open source. The signal protocol is a pretty solid protocol supporting E2EE. There are not even cloud backup options, so your messages can never be read from someone other than you and the receiver, unlike something like iMessage that has cloud backup option that backups your messages stored locally on your device probably in plain text to iCloud.

    • Frub@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree that signal is superior in terms of privacy but a lot of people don’t care about that. And most people using WhatsApp DEFINITELY don’t care about that.

    • Rescuer6394@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      does signal have multi device synchronization? on telegram you can start to write a message on one device and continue on another.

      one of the feature i use most on telegram is saved messages to send stuff between phone and pc.

      this is pretty much the only thing that is keeping me on telegram.