https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/2135509

this is practically a child’s view of the world. good guy vs bad guy. Russia = bad, NATO = good. plus, someone should tell her she has it completely backwards: ending russia is kinda natos entire thing

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s depleted NATO’s stockpile, armed a new generation of radicalized right-wing mercenaries (who will definitely not sit quietly in Europe after the war ends) and has deindustrialized Europe through the energy crisis

    It hasn’t benefited NATO countries, it’s benefited the US momentarily, until it blunders into another foreign policy mess

    • Barbariandude [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      depleted NATO’s stockpile

      Of obsolete equipment that was just sitting in storage costing the US money. Other countries are looking at this as an opportunity to modernize cheaply by getting the US to replace what they’re sending with better gear.

      Armed a new generation of radicalized right-wing mercenaries

      No comment. You might be right about that, remains to be seen.

      Deindustrialized Europe

      Absolutely not true. The EU has managed to recover from the pipelines turning off, and have built up LNG terminals to keep on chugging without issue. It cost and will cost a lot of money, but the industry will flow. If anything, the big loser in this is the global south who might not have the cash to compete with the EU buying up LNG, not Europe.

      • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not just obsolete equipment, in most NATO countries it’s the only equipment these countries have, and there’s no definition of “obsolete” that includes Himars, patriots, strykers, Bradleys, Ceasars, Leopards, Challengers, those are the mainstays of western armaments, and there is no such thing as “cheap” modernization, especially not when it comes to the US arms industry

        Absolutely not true. The EU has managed to recover from the pipelines turning off, and have built up LNG terminals to keep on chugging without issue.

        What you’re asserting simply isn’t true, https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/europe-facing-costly-winter-without-enough-long-term-lng-deals-2023-04-06/

        https://apnews.com/article/europe-business-germany-weather-european-union-9b1e7c90542b8dd6ab5b9bae47c65d95

        The German manufacturing PMI index has sunk to 38.8 (50 is supposed to signal recession), that’s the lowest level since 2020 at 32.0 during the height of the Covid depression

        And that’s the top performing economy in Europe right now

        • Barbariandude [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The number of modern systems in play is tiny. The vast majority of the aid has been old systems. 4 HIMARS and 50 Bradleys are hardly going to deplete US supply, let’s be real here.

          About the various links, none of that contradicts what I’m saying. I didn’t say that this had no cost, quite on the contrary. I said that EU funds buying up supply will hurt more than the EU, and the EU does have the cash to afford this.

          About the PMI, your own link does not connect this to the energy sector. It connects this to weaker demand for goods. Comparing and contrasting with Italy, France, Czech Republic, Poland and Romania shows a similar story: companies are dropping production due to expectations that demand is dipping as people are tightening their purses.

          • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            11 months ago

            The number of modern systems in play is tiny.

            Bro what are you talking about?

            4 HIMARS and 50 Bradleys are hardly going to deplete US supply

            That’s incorrect it’s 38+ Himars and 186 Bradleys so far from the US alone, also I’m not only talking about US stockpiles, I said “NATO countries” and it’s not the launcher systems that are in danger of being depleted, it’s the ammunition they fire

            It connects this to weaker demand for goods. Comparing and contrasting with Italy, France, Czech Republic, Poland and Romania shows a similar story: companies are dropping production due to expectations that demand is dipping as people are tightening their purses.

            Yes, weaker consumer demand because the money in those tight purses are going to personnel energy costs which have skyrocketed again despite the summer dip, hence the recession numbers across the board, there’s no sector of the economy that doesn’t affect the others

            • Barbariandude [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              11 months ago

              Sorry, I was looking at old numbers. 38 HIMARS and 186 bradleys is no danger to US stockpiles either. Ammo though, that’s a more interesting question. Arms industries are ramping up production like mad. This is an absolute godsend for arms companies. This isn’t hurting NATO, this is lining the pockets of military industrial sectors worldwide.

              On the financial front, I’m rapidly reaching the limit of my knowledge. I will concede the point, but warn that at least in the east, people are willing to absorb a lot of financial pain if it means punching the Russian empire in the face. Western Europe may be forced, kicking and screaming, to follow suit for fear of fracturing Europe.

              • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                11 months ago

                This is an absolute godsend for arms companies. This isn’t hurting NATO, this is lining the pockets of military industrial sectors worldwide.

                When I say NATO I’m naively including Europe and not simply the United States, US arms companies are indeed making dough and the Euro regimes may even be willing to print out the big bucks for the American MIC, but those countries also have native defense industries that make up a sizable chunk of their national manufacturing sectors, and I’m telling you right now bro there is no way the cheapskate ordoliberals of Europe are gonna pay for two continent wide modernization programs, it’s either the Americans or their own local arms companies and the Americans are gonna win out

                but warn that at least in the east, people are willing to absorb a lot of financial pain if it means punching the Russian empire in the face Western Europe may be forced, kicking and screaming, to follow suit for fear of fracturing Europe.

                Translation; the neoliberal regimes of Europe are willing to sacrifice the livelihoods of their citizens to further the ambitions of an American dominated NATO and sow the seeds of future war and the inevitable blowback it entails

                • Barbariandude [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  It’s not only the US industry ramping up. Companies across Europe are expanding existing ammo factories and making new ones. With the blank cheque that Ukraine has been given by the US, they’re not doing this for free.

                  You can cynically look at this as “sacrificing the livelihoods of citizens”, and I’m not going to stop you if you want to see it that way, but in some specific countries, any sign of weakness towards Russia by a politician would cause that politician to be thrown out. If not by vote of no confidence, then by mob.

                  • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    You’re contradicting yourself because you’re not being specific, it’s not “companies across europe” it’s the native defense industries of only a few countries, Germany, France, UK and maybe Italy none are which the insane eastern states that would lynch a politican for negotiating with russia

                    The rest would blow a hole in their budget if they attempted to expand local industrial production of weapons beyond a certain point

                    And the big countries don’t want to expand cause that will also blow a hole in their budget, Europe is ruled by Americanized ordoliberals, the cratering of millions of their citizen’s livelihoods didn’t stop them from cutting the state and a proxy war in Ukraine isn’t gonna stop them either

                    They’ll waste money on expensive overenineered American garbage and then call it a day and the Eastern states can go back to the Soviet Union to replenish their stock- oh wait no they can’t they’ll also have to buy trash Anerican weapon systems

      • TrudeauCastroson [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        Have they recovered though? Germany especially is stupid because their greens pushed to turn off nuclear plants and won, after they already started sanctioning Russia. Consumer inflation is high in the Nato-sphere because cost of transport and energy went way up.

        I guess we’ll see if EU pushes for a ceasefire after another winter of expensive natural gas. I’m surprised the nordstream bombing didn’t piss off more Germans.

        Global south countries seem to be working around how expensive war made some things by trading with Russia directly for stuff instead of paying market rate, which is why all those African countries don’t feel like condemning the invasion.

        • Barbariandude [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Consumer inflation…

          Yeah, very much the case. I feel this every day. It’s caused some grumbling, but not many people are linking this with NATO. The tendency seems to be blaming Russia. Again, anecdotally, but still.

          EU ceasefire

          No chance. Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Poland and Bulgaria would riot. All of the Bucharest Nine are firmly against giving Russia time to rearm, replenish and come back for round two, which is what they expect Russia would use the ceasefire for.

          Global south…

          Unfortunately very true. Russia blowing up the grain shipment deal didn’t help. Hopefully Turkey can bring them back to the negotiating table.

          • CascadeOfLight [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Important to note that Russia didn’t wantonly scrap the grain deal, they just didn’t renew it when it expired - for the simple reason that the other side didn’t uphold even one single part of their end of the bargain.