• keeb420@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ok. How far back should we go? I’m feeling the 1970s and go from there. Oh lokkie here it shows that the poor and middle class have doubled their productivity. Oh wait wages have been effectively slashed? Hmm.

  • C4d@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    Should a real terms pay cut be accompanied by a compensatory drop in productivity? I think it’s called quiet quitting or something…

  • Neirin@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    I agree that productivity should be rewarded, but that’s not what happens. If you work hard, the company will realise that they can get the same work done with fewer employees and will reduce work hours to increase profits instead of rewarding you.

    • Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      More importantly, as a centralized bank economy, it’s the government’s fault inflation exists and it is their responsibility, as and employer and monitor of inflation, to make their employees while every year. If productivity increases, that should be paid on top of pay maintenance.

  • Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    We got that system in the US. I just got my review. Boss says I did great, mentions a couple areas I excelled in. Shows me the review. Everything rated straight down the middle. Turns out when it comes to paying me more, I’m just a medium/ok worker.

    • petenu@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well, if it’s any consolation, I imagine that there are lots of companies out there who would be more than willing to pay you what you’re worth.

  • Idirian@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    In his case, being so incredibly shit and inept, he should be paying billions back then. This duplicitous twat should just fuck off.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Sunak’s comments come after Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey expressed concerns that pay increases were fuelling inflation.

    The Bank of England is now under renewed pressure to raise interest rates next month after wages jumped more than expected in June, boosted by a one-off payment to NHS workers.

    However, amid recent inflation and rising interest rates, trade unions have taken issue with the apparent blame attached by Bailey and others to wage demands by low and middle earners.

    The Trades Union Congress (TUC) general secretary, Paul Nowak, said on Tuesday: “Real wages are still worth less today than in 2008 after the longest pay squeeze in 200 years.

    An analysis in June by the TUC also found that pay rises for the top 10% of UK earners, including City bosses, had clearly outstripped the rest of the workforce and had been a prime driver of recent inflation and interest rates.

    Sunak trumpeted the public sector pay offers that the government had extended to NHS workers, teachers and others and called for an an end to industrial action by doctors.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Bigs@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    This article is so slimy. Sustainable here really means in relation to the fiduciary responsibility to the board. To use another C-suite term, the sustainable pay rise is often immaterial.

  • SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m far from an expert on this but I thought that an increase in productivity was the end result of multiple things coming together. Investment, training, a strong economy etc etc??