correcthorsedickbatterystaple

A not insignificant portion of the homeless are drug addicts, severely mentally ill, or both. These people can be dangerous. Not having them congregate in very public areas is a public safety issue. Full stop.

A not insignificant portion of the most vulnerable among the public are drug addicts, severely mentally ill, or both. These people can be dangerous due to not receiving treatment according to their and the public’s health needs. Not having them ( “a not insignificant…untreated…portion of the homeless”) congregate in very public areas is a human rights issue.

P.S. Both sides have valid points. The charity has a right to distribute food, but the most vulnerable among the public don’t have the same right to safely use public facilities as the rest of the public.

biblically accurate samsung galaxy s24

Ford Executive Chair Bill Ford calls on autoworkers to end strike, says Shareholders’ Income is at Stake.

you do it with massive funding to public education for generations.

which is why massive first amendment violations are more likely

Alito […] was reduced to incoherence himself

…huh…didn’t expect that from such a distinguished jurist

who are you, Winston Smith, that’s so important…

of course GC/BC is a metaphor. ACAB. and they aren’t elected to help us but to represent us. they fail, but like i said, one side is rushing to put everything to an end and the other is at least making a poor showing of keeping up the pretense.

Congress shall make no law

i think a lot of people misunderstand positive vs negative rights. the US Constitution doesn’t grant rights. the Declaration of Independence declared all are endowed with rights by a creator. that is the origin of our rights - inalienable. the Constitution doesn’t grant anything. it establishes the structure of a federal government, and the amendments to that guarantee what already exists in the Declaration. it limits power of an authority over a person.

a very divisive example is arms. the Constitution doesn’t grant americans the right to keep and bear arms. it limits the government from prohibiting such.

of course…this is the intent not necessarily the reality

edit:
also the lack of critical thinking of this argument is so astounding i didn’t even notice it at first…no freedom from religion…which…one? which version of that one…? the constitution - which compels nothing but the government - can…compel americans to all be…uh - jehovah’s witnesses? mormons? sunni? bahai?

good cop bad cop.

no. i do not mean both sides are the same. one side wants the status quo to remain but isn’t taking seriously the fact that their bad cop partner is going to take them both down. maybe because they’re all as fucking old as possible.

i am not sure i’m comfortable with expressing a desire to string anyone up but i agree that when WEAREALLDOMESTICTERRORISTS isn’t a statement that grinds this whole shitshow to a halt and we examine wtf is going on in the US … then wtf are people doing?

“manhattan project - we don’t need any more from those democrat run cities”

“apollo program - sounds like the name of one of those groomer drag shows”

quakawwquakquakawwwquakquakaww

i don’t like putting words in others’ mouths, but if i had to guess, or if it were my comment, my sentiment would be there’s nothing that would be constitutionally permitted that would cause or allow him to feel joy. the only way he feels joy is if it’s something to the determent of the american public and their consitution.

but i’m not speaking for winterayars, they can speak for themselves if they wish to clarify.

Balls

english breakfast:

protein ham
protein bacon
protein sausage
protein eggs
protein beans
protein/garbage blood sausage

garbage mushrooms
garbage tomato

starch hash browns
starch toast

…but the beans make it superior to anything americans do. seriously beans with breakfast wtf are americans doing wrong. missing beans that’s what

but seriously…choose a protein or two and ditch the fucking mushrooms jfc wtf is wrong with people it’s not an animal or a plant its a fungus i don’t want to eat the stuff that grows at the base of your toilet.

ditch the mushrooms and it looks delicious. and add more beans.

attributed to john lennon: “if you tried to give rock and roll another name you might call it ‘chuck berry’”

attributed to bob dylan: chuck berry is “the shakespeare of rock and roll”

…how ‘articulate’ do you need to be?

what a nonce

you’re absolutely right. perfect should be the enemy of good.

you honestly believe the global south will be no worse if the world’s only hegemon turns fascist?

deleted by creator

utterly disconnected with reality

is there another way to accumulate that amount of wealth?

having said that, if unemployment is 10% and he thinks it needs to jump (and not to be 50%) then unemployment would be at 15%

no idea why some take issue with your statement…the 9th paragraph of the article:

“The problem is that where destructive earthquakes are rare, buildings are simply not constructed robustly enough to cope with strong ground shaking, so many collapse, resulting in high casualties,” said Bill McGuire, professor emeritus of geophysical and climate hazards at University College London. “I would expect the final death toll to climb into the thousands once more is known. As with any big quake, aftershocks are likely, which will lead to further casualties and hinder search and rescue.”

emphasis mine

that’s the means. the end is for them to all stay in the closet, or…if their prayers are answered (good luck with that) to not exist.