• ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    I posted this when I saw this on another community:

    This is honestly probably more of a transition jobs program for oil workers and something designed to get a few extra votes in Congress. One of the projects is in my state (Louisiana) and the politicians all stressed how it’s creating jobs in the oil producing Southwest part of the state. And the other project is in East Texas. The companies even pinky swore that at least 10% of their workforce would be former oil workers.

    In the end, I see this a low risk, high reward experiment that, while obviously used for greenwashing, also builds support for a green economy in places where oil jobs are the middle class ones.

    I also could see this being a way to create specialized carbon-based fuels after the transition. Hopefully, it gets cheaper than drilling and can supply whatever “fossil” fuels are still around. (The world’s militaries probably aren’t gonna switch to green hydrogen and renewables by 2040.)

    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This is a bit like giving serial rapists jobs watching after victims of sexual assault.

      The shit states shouldn’t profit from the mess they made.

      Tax the states/corporations responsible, maybe give some back to workers.

      Kids who died of asthma aren’t getting anything out of this deal, why should oil states?

      • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I agree. Outlaw petroleum extraction and then just nuke the areas that have the petroleum workers. Blame the nukes on Russia or China. No more industry, no jobs to worry about. [brushed dust off hands] Done and done.

        /s

        • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If you nuked half of Texas, how could you tell which half is which?

          I guess one side would have somewhat fewer epic assholes.

      • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I see this more as an attempt to sway voters who are motivated by their jobs to vote for oil friendly politicians.

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Louisiana doesn’t benefit from the fucking oil industry bribing politicians, raising sea levels, industrializing coastal areas, and giving people cancer. The companies aren’t even based here. We’re just cursed to be next to Texas.

        And Texans also don’t benefit from being a corrupt petrostate. The natural resource curse is real.