• avapa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The nuclear ship had sailed long before the Green Party became part of the current government. While I also think that nuclear power is a much better alternative to coal power plants it’s simply not feasible to revert Germany’s decision when wind and solar is as cheap as it is now.

    • Fjaeger@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not familiar with the German politics, but are you saying that Germany got rid of nuclear despite environmentalists?

      • zielgruppe@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        These decisions are mainly rooted in the peace movement of the 80s (fueled by the nuclear missiles in Germany installed by the US) and the direct experience of Tschernobyl. Its supported by the majority in the public.

        The current political decision was made by the more conversative government.

        • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think there is also an important cultural difference between Germany and France that led to different nuclear program.

          In the German political system there is strong regional and local governments and a weaker federal government that holds all that together.

          In the French political system there a very strong centralized government and regional or local government don’t have much power.

          Nuclear worked very well in France because of that. Nuclear energy need to be organized at a national level, German prefer energy that can be deployed locally or regionally.

    • Baŝto@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like the the Greens, but they actually initiated the phase out the last time they ruled 20 years ago. One of their core ideologies was the opposition of nuclear power.

      But they were also for a coal phaseout. They aren’t responsible for how atomic plants got replaced and that the phaseout got changed into specific dates, they implemented a more flexible phaseout.

      A later government decided to slowly replace coal plants with gas plants and keep those coal plants in standby for emergencies for some time. Which is what triggered last year, as those standby plants fired up again when gas plants became unreliable.

    • SMITHandWESSON@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with solar is going to be scaling it to meet power demands. Never mind the fact that solar companies are cutting down trees to make way for solar fields.

      Nuclear energy and hopefully nuclear fusion will be the future