• 𝕯𝖎𝖕𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖙@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s true, most people don’t care about money.

    They care about what money can help them buy, like another day of survival.

    It was never about the money. It was about maslovs heirarchy of needs; which, at the very bottom, is a foosball table.

    • myplacedk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s two kinds of money: Enough money, and more than enough money.

      If you don’t have enough money, that’s all that matters. A nicer day at work means very little.

      Once you have enough money, more money matters very little. Now it’s about enjoying work etc.

      • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah but what is enough money for you or I is not enough money for the bigwigs. And since they’re obviously more important, as they’re at the top, we have to have sure they get enough money even if that means you don’t.

        But they’ll get you a ping pong table so you can stop thinking about how you don’t know what you’re going to feed your family tonight

      • TheGreenGolem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is brilliant!

        Tangentially related, I heard another about enough money:

        When you already have enough money, do you really need 2x enough money?

        • aksdb@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your baseline can change.

          You may be fine with $1000 a month. You have everything you need: food, bed, apartment, electricity, etc.

          Now you get a new job and have $2000. You try out more expensive food options and realize you like them better. You move into a bigger apartment and start enjoying the freedom.

          You may never wanted this if you didn’t try it, but now that you have, you don’t want to go back. You may not have noticed that your mental and physical health was degraded due to your previous living conditions until you get better after raising your standards.

          • TheGreenGolem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I interpreted enough as really enough, when you are really well off and can afford the good stuff/vacations/good cars whatever.

            But you are right. The definition of enough changes through ones lifetime quite a bit. I would have a really hard time going back to broke (student).

            • Gork@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m like mid-career and I can’t afford vacations. There’s always some other priority for the money and I would feel guilty for spending it on something that is by nature temporary and ephemeral.

        • Erk@cdda.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That question isn’t the best way to frame it, because yeah… 2x “enough” is pretty reasonable. That’s still well within the high returns of happiness phase.

          Do you need 1000x enough, though? Or 1000x that? I’d love a high end espresso maker, or a nicer car, or to be able to afford to take more time off, but there comes a point where more is just pointless.

    • SirShanova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah like, cmon, what do you think the pyramid sits on. On the floor??? No, on the holiest of of foosball tables!