• 0x01@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    After how ajit pai shilled the fuck out of the chair position I don’t know if I can ever take it seriously again.

    Fuck ajit pai, of course.

  • Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    They’ve been stealing taxpayer dollars for 30 years, constantly stalling and delaying and then saying the plans are now outdated and we need more money for the new plans. Repeat every decade. Everyone knows it’s a monopoly with speed/price fixing yet somehow it never improves.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Can’t speak to Comcast’s evils, but I call my ISP once a year to ask about my speeds and bill. Just got bumped from 200/20 to 1000/?, with a $10 discount. I’m on the edge of town, not technically rural, but close enough.

      Not sure the answer to the monopoly thing, but I used to be an internet cable guy, so I can speak to the complexity of having 2 providers where there was only one. The costs are staggering.

      • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not sure the answer to the monopoly thing,

        • make it a publicly owned and operated municipal utility
        • make the “last mile” publicly owned infrastructure and private service providers can connect to the data center that connects the last mile
        • require that the company who owns and maintains the last mile can not also be a service provider over that last mile infrastructure

        The last one is how Texas handles the power grid, so it would need a real regulatory body making sure the private last mile infrastructure is actually maintained, unlike the Texas power grid.

  • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes that’s shit.

    But also on top of that 25 really means maybe 15, because they also don’t require them to provide the bandwidth they advertise to you.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes. We need the numbers to be minimum bitrates and we need at least a 90% uptime for that minimum. If you could rely on your bandwidth to be a specific rate all the time you could pay for less and everyone could get more without more infrastructure upgrades.

    • Kerrigor@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Absolutely not. It depends more on what you’re doing, rather than number of people, anyways. One person uploading a video is going to use 99% of the available upload bandwidth.

  • Kinglink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Great, now what are we going to do about it?

    Hell just outlaw datacaps and I’d say that’s a good step.

    That being said I doubt almost anyone on here probably has more than those speeds, Cox (the worst cable company, trust me) gives me 10x those numbers, but the real problem is they’ll continue to raise the rates on us, and worse, there’s no competition. Verizon 5g came by and it’s not really a viable alternative, because Cox just out paces them enough, but ultimately, you’re going to spend at least 100 dollars a month on Cable, but still there’s no choices available.