github copilot has, by their own admission, been trained on mountains of gpl code, so i'm unclear on how it's not a form of laundering open source code into commercial works. the handwave of "it usually doesn't reproduce exact chunks" is not very satisfying
shouldn’t it at least become public domain? :(
Just create a license which adds a clausule setting that and ask some lawyer dedicated to it.
Just like the AGPL came with a clausule over the GPL for the server side.
copilot itself? Still no. Copyright applies to creative work made by humans. The copyright of copilot belongs to microsoft and that’s it.