Also between this and knowing he ate cottage cheese with canned pineapple or ketchup has me conflicted on this dweebish monster

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    24 days ago

    Real talk sometimes I wish the Persians won just to see how wildly divergent history would’ve been.

    Probably nothing whatsoever would change in a long run, Achaemenid rule over Greece wouldn’t last long, it was too far and Greeks would try to topple the satrapy, so there would be uprisings and it would get scrapped during the next dynasty crisis or civil war. Also Macedonia would remain outside of it anyway.

    • GVAGUY3 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      24 days ago

      This is kinda what I was thinking. Nothing much would change. Probably no Peloppenesian Wars. Macedonia would probably have undergone the same path. The Greeks were stubborn bastards. Many of them sided with the Achaemenids during the Persian wars anyway.

      • Formerlyfarman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        24 days ago

        The Peloponnesian war was arguably much more impactful than the Persian wars. It did affect the relations of production, almost 2 thirds of Athenian citizens died, and wages for craftsmen went from 7 liters of grain equivalent wich is sort of average for a pre industrial society to 15, Wich is insanely high. This kept slavery, and the associated superstructure economically viable. So no Peloponnesian war probably means Greece transitions away from a slave society into some form of tenancy much earlier. As well as greater efforts for Greek colonisation of Ukraine and the Mediterranean.

        What impact does this have in the world? Probably not much. They would break away eventually and a new war between them may have the same demographic effect.

        On the other hand a Feudal society may be more amenable to Persian rule, and may cause alexander to not exist. Making the empire last longer.

        On the gripping hand, even if there is no alexander the empire is not going to last much longer either. There was an agrarian crisis shortly after Alexander’s conquest, that would have happened anyway. so it’s likely that would cause it’s fall in this alt history, so at best they get 20 years more. And there would still be an Hellenistic world in the eastern Mediterranean afterwards.

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 days ago

      macedonia was even made a tributary by Darius on his way south, that they and ionians are still counted among the greeks is testament to the fact persian domination would not remove ‘greek-ness’ from greece.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        24 days ago

        Yeah and even Anatolian Greeks didn’t lose anything of their culture under Persian rule and even greekised their neighbours and became one of the main pillars of first Hellenistic and then Byzantine cultures.