They said that in society it is expected to see people dressed in see through clothes and that by going outside you consent to seeing that. I’m not saying that I personally have a problem with people dressing how they want, but it’s not a good explanation imo. There’s no other option for people that DO object to people dressed in see through clothing. It’s not like society is segregated by clothing, so it’s kinda normal to see people dressed in all kind of ways. So to say that by being in society you consent to seeing people dressed that way, is not really true. If someone is against clothing like that, are they expected to live like a hermit? They said “by going out in public, you consent”, is the implication that people who don’t consent are supposed to live indoors? Correct me if I’m wrong because I agreed w 95% of what they said besides that point