You know, about a dozen hours ago I was just thinking about how careful the WSJ was to mislead readers without explicitly taking a side on the matter. I misremembered this story as the WSJ itself telling people to relax, when it did something subtler and less direct than that: selective reporting.
If Mein Kampf, the NSDAP’s antisemitism and the violence from the Fascist paramilitaries in the Weimar Republic were somehow insufficient warnings, then Fascist Italy and specifically its atrocities against Libyans (including putting thousands in concentration camps) should have been thorough.
You know, about a dozen hours ago I was just thinking about how careful the WSJ was to mislead readers without explicitly taking a side on the matter. I misremembered this story as the WSJ itself telling people to relax, when it did something subtler and less direct than that: selective reporting.
If Mein Kampf, the NSDAP’s antisemitism and the violence from the Fascist paramilitaries in the Weimar Republic were somehow insufficient warnings, then Fascist Italy and specifically its atrocities against Libyans (including putting thousands in concentration camps) should have been thorough.