You say this as if Deng conspired behind the backs of the people to betray the revolution instead of the people themselves conducting land reform experiments during a time of stagnation and dogma all to insure their own survival and build an opportunity for prosperity. Deng and the Party defended the people from dogmatists and provided China with an opportunity to not only continue the socialist construction project but also to face off against its own dogmas that fed stagnation.
Thats what socialist countries do by definition. Every socialist country is a socialist project that is under construction. Socialism is not created by fiat or by treaty. Socialist construction is the longest and most difficult phase of revolution. It is the phase that no western marxist, and few socialists at all, have even reached. This is why Deng says China must cross the brook by feeling for the stones, socialism is constructed under a fog of difficulty and ignorance that is only barely illuminated by the Marxism, our candle in the dark. No dogma that developed during a revolutionary war and its aftermath is going to be able to carry the revolution forward. This is why socialist construction is so difficult and why lambasting those (like the Deng and the Chinese people) who have been on the ground trying to accomplish unprecedented achievements as revisionists oftentimes just feeds dogma and enforces stagnation.
Your questions assumes China somehow discarded these things while also ignoring China’s actual conditions. Its just dogma. You are building a house in your head and then unhappy when the builders tell you what is possible or available.
How can they not? Your question is just an assumption that an impoverished and nearly destroyed country like China could become fully socialist within a very short period of time. This is simply not demonstrated.
The USSR was not as “backward” as China. You are enforcing a bad comparison to suite your dogma.
My brother in Christ, the USSR has fallen. I think its safe to say they were unsuccessful in their socialist construction regardless of the incredible successes they did achieve.
You say this as if Deng conspired behind the backs of the people to betray the revolution instead of the people themselves conducting land reform experiments during a time of stagnation and dogma all to insure their own survival and build an opportunity for prosperity. Deng and the Party defended the people from dogmatists and provided China with an opportunity to not only continue the socialist construction project but also to face off against its own dogmas that fed stagnation.
Removed by mod
Thats what socialist countries do by definition. Every socialist country is a socialist project that is under construction. Socialism is not created by fiat or by treaty. Socialist construction is the longest and most difficult phase of revolution. It is the phase that no western marxist, and few socialists at all, have even reached. This is why Deng says China must cross the brook by feeling for the stones, socialism is constructed under a fog of difficulty and ignorance that is only barely illuminated by the Marxism, our candle in the dark. No dogma that developed during a revolutionary war and its aftermath is going to be able to carry the revolution forward. This is why socialist construction is so difficult and why lambasting those (like the Deng and the Chinese people) who have been on the ground trying to accomplish unprecedented achievements as revisionists oftentimes just feeds dogma and enforces stagnation.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Your questions assumes China somehow discarded these things while also ignoring China’s actual conditions. Its just dogma. You are building a house in your head and then unhappy when the builders tell you what is possible or available.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
How can they not? Your question is just an assumption that an impoverished and nearly destroyed country like China could become fully socialist within a very short period of time. This is simply not demonstrated.
Ouisconkom even said Mao Zedong was revisionist. Talking to him is a waste of time
Removed by mod
The USSR was not as “backward” as China. You are enforcing a bad comparison to suite your dogma.
My brother in Christ, the USSR has fallen. I think its safe to say they were unsuccessful in their socialist construction regardless of the incredible successes they did achieve.
Removed by mod
Obtuse
Removed by mod
Then why dont you press the socialist button and fix everything?
最终阿尔巴尼亚失败了
你这么懂，为什么阿尔巴尼亚最后垮台了？