My gut answer is “yes!!!” or “revolution” but I want to hear what y’all think. For those unware, some creative professions such as film writers get paid a small portion of all revenue generated by their work after it’s been produced, which is called a “residual,” and it’s part of their current fight with hollywood not properly paying those residuals due to the streaming loophole.
Since most programs that are profitable are based on the work of long gone developers (basically capital that gets worked on by machine labour), I think this might be a great demand for an eventual software development union.
What do y’all think?
Ive been thinking a bit about it, but there’s no obvious solution. We’re reasonably well treated by the capital.
Anything we ask is likely to lower our financial returns in the short term, in my opinion, since free-software can’t tap into “free-market” money as easily, for it’s intrinsic scaling/copyleft characteristics.
Specifically, we could ask that union members have to dedicate (say) 5% of their hours to free software initiatives. We’d not be releasing proprietary code, but it would be contributing to the ecosystem.
Still, I think something we miss as software developers is the willingness to find our own customers, to use FOSS to compete seriously with middleman giants, like uber and booking.
I’m finding activity pub and lemmy a really interesting case for free, decentralised competition, and a possible solution to scam, by giving providers a chance to build their reputation. There’s also opencollective.com’s business model, where anyone making money with their platform has to pay them.
How that ties back down with unions, I’m not sure, but I feel those discussions could move forward hand in hand.