• loathsome dongeaterA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    From the report that the article cites.

    According to the data analysed by PreciseSecurity.com and collected by CompariTech

    Both companies are from the UK.

    As an aside, journalists for news organisations rarely do research on their own. More often they ingest studies done by other dedicated organisations and reproduce them in a form that appeals to their audience. When scrutinising news articles it’s good to see what the primary source is.

    • Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we’re comparing US to China I tried to use a source outside of both countries. I’d expect it to massage the wording a bit on some stuff (especially in an effort to avoid making the UK look bad) but I would think that the numbers aren’t terribly off.

      Look, if we were discussing cameras in the UK. This wouldn’t be my go to source. I also dont want to use a Chinese source on Chinese surveillance…you know that they monitor what goes out of China…

        • Alteon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your first comment in response to mine stated that the US had more cameras per capita. I pointed out that your source was from a Chinese newspaper and provided where I got my source from.

          We don’t like each other’s sources. I claimed that atleast mine was not coming from either of the two countries (US and China)