Why didn’t this happen in 2021 despite faster cars? Weren’t the tires similar then?
Why didn’t this happen in 2021 despite faster cars? Weren’t the tires similar then?
It is okay if there is a non teratogenic alternative that treats the targeted disease. Why risk teratogenicity when you can altogether avoid it?
Exactly. It’s not a “where do we draw the line” thing here, the line is already drawn as you allude to. It’s not just CT scans as well, some actual medications need pregnancy tests or at least active contraception use. Roaccutane, methotrexate and other DMARDs etc - everything in medicine is a risk vs reward thing and I’m sure many patient would prefer not to be on a drug that messes up their fetus whether they’re planning to keep it or not in the case they get pregnant. You’d rather just avoid the risk of that situation occuring altogether.
Yup. Common practive with anti-epileptics - some have worse implications for babies than others which is why those said others are used first.
Collectivist =/= Communist, I am tired or arguing with Red Scare Americans who do not understand what Communism even is, nor understand the fact that a government that implements mass privatisation that the Nazis put in place is the exact opposite of communism. Fuck me.
Me when I ignore the numerous amounts of right wing genocidal dictators installed by western capitalist governments in other countries in the name of capitalism (I am using Black Book of Communism rhetoric, a book that included stagnating birth rates and death of Nazi figures in war to inflate my figures as I have no other argument of substance).
I absolutely don’t doubt that individual accounts will have useful lessons to learn. But personal experience will always have personal biases. People will literally change the way they experience reality to facillitate their world view, which is why the sentiment of this post is stupid af. Just because “you were there” doesn’t make you any more of an arbiter of truth than someone who wasn’t. At most it provides you with the advantage of a perspective more directly affected by said events.
So you don’t know what communism is since you mentioned it needing a state. I guess Nazi Germany is communist because of the “collectivist” goal of the Nazi party to improve the “motherland.” Wtf am I saying, you probably actually believe that.
I wonder what you think the motive behind colonialism and the transatlantic slave trade was.
It’s honestly the equivalent of saying that because you lived in a country you know more about the sociopolitical status of it and why it got there thab someone who doesn’t. Like when people say “you never lived in X type of country, so you have no idea why it was so bad.”
I’d trust a sociology professor from the UK about why living conditions in America are so bad for the average working class person much more than a MAGA conservative nutjob who believes in the deep state trying to replace white people. Just like how this post doesn’t really prove that just because you were there means you’re an expert in that event or why and how it happened.
Because it pushes surface level feminism
Me when I purposely try to ignore global power structures put into place by numerous historical events.
Hamilton has buckets of understeer
Even more groundbreaking if their cell structure and genetic material structure is similar to the bacteria on Earth.
Seeing as this is useful for allergens, is this useful for atopy un general?
Carlos Sainz’s racing IQ is insane.
Mercedes has been on it with strategy all weekend
Sainz actually has this race in his pocket at the moment. Unbelievably comfortable right now.
A taste of what this season would have been like without Verstappen.
idk if i’m missing something but i use connect and this is what it does on the “communities” tab