Red Magpie

  • 2 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle


  • Fantastic info, thanks so much; they both look great and this is an amazing headstart into modding the game.

    Thanks for the reassurance re the mods I’ve listed as well. My thinking was the same as yours in that I’m not after anything graphically intensive, but I didn’t know whether the engine had some quirks which flooded RAM if there were too many assets included in some mods, or whether some well-known mods were infamous for chewing up CPU cycles with borky scripts which would result in an unplayable game on the Deck.




  • I read/write/speak Esperanto fairly fluently and I thoroughly enjoy the language and a lot of its literature but I don’t particularly like the broader Esperanto movement; although my big caveat is that I’m a bit of an Esperanto hermit and don’t participate in much of the group stuff such as the national/international Esperanto associations, groups etc.

    I have two main problems with “la Esperantujo” (the “Esperanto-verse”).

    The first is that I find it very inward looking. This is to say that as a new learner or intermediate speaker, you’re going to want to find contemporary reading material or stuff to listen to and a lot of the material is about Esperanto itself and its designer, Zamenhof. This is understandable because the language and its speakers have developed their own shared culture distinct from national cultures and members of that culture want to talk about their history and where they’ve come from. This is absolutely fine, but I feel that there is a disproportionate amount of this compared to e.g. stuff about technology or science or philosophy, or news/politics that doesn’t directly relate to the Esperanto movement, or personal blogs which aren’t just discussing events at various Esperanto conferences.

    I also understand that one of the goals of the Esperanto movement is to actually spread Esperanto as an international auxiliary language and that necessitates a certain amount of self-focus in order to understand their material conditions and improve their praxis; similar to how a communist org should be refining itself through praxis. But from my vantage point it just feels kind of like those Ultraleft orgs who do a lot of talking in their own congresses and branches but don’t do much engagement or organised work.

    I dunno maybe I’m just grumpy and I should participate more.

    I’ve found some notable gems of Esperanto-language material if any budding Esperantists want to get a flavour of the language in use online. I’m always keen to be corrected and learn about more so please if anyone knows of any good Esperanto-language blogs, podcasts, or news outlets then I’d love to check them out.

    • uea.facila is a blog written in easy-to-understand Esperanto. Articles are fairly diverse in topics and have a good balance between just interesting stuff and news about the Esperantujo. Each article also has an audio file of the narration and has definitions of new or uncommon words, with the definitions written in Esperanto.
    • Scivolemo (en: Curiosity) is an Esperanto-language science blog. It contains some good articles in straightforward Esperanto which should be accessible to someone who is comfortable reading the articles on facila.org and who is OK looking up a few words here and there.
    • kern.punkto (en: Core point, kernel etc.) is a fairly regular Esperanto-language podcast about technology, culture, and society.

    My second problem with the Esperantujo is that I’ve mostly found the politics to skew very Western Liberal in the vein of the average US Democrat voter. China and Russia are bad, Gaza is complicated because Hamas are “problematic”, etc etc. Libera Folio is one of the more prolific Esperanto-language outlets and regularly has stuff which will make most Communists’ eyes roll. Recently I had to stop reading an article about Esperanto in BRICS because the author was saying that Russia and China were totalitarian and wouldn’t allow their citizens to be exposed to any other idea other than state media. There is also the Esperanto-language feed of Global Voices which kinda has “Radio Free Esperanto” vibes to me.

    At one point there did exist La Internacia Komunista Kolektivo (IKEK), but as far as I can tell it’s basically defunct. I’ve not been able to access the website for some time and when I did a lot of the posts were from 2009 or something.

    Put together, this doesn’t leave a lot of spaces for a principled leftist to organise or engage in internationalism within the Esperantujo as it can be a den of libs who will accuse you of being a Chinese or Russian bot. In one Esperanto-language mega group chat I was in on Telegram, someone was praising some aspects of fascism and when I challenged this I was told that I was contradicting Freeze Peech, but when I later discussed IKEK and inquired about any Communist Esperantists I saw a lot of “Ew Commies are worst than Nazis gtfo” style stuff. Of course there won’t be Commie Esperanto spaces until we go to create one, but I think that the material conditions are such that I think most principled commies see that organising efforts are perhaps best placed elsewhere for now.

    So that’s my thoughts on the Esperanto Movement. This is different to my thoughts on Esperanto itself. It’s not perfect, it’s definitely Eurocentric. I’m sure a linguistics expert could come up with a bunch of reasons as long as my arm about why the language itself sucks, but I find it really fun and it taught me a lot about learning languages and I’ve really enjoyed a lot of the poetry and literature I’ve encountered.



  • Ah that sucks to hear :-( I didn’t know there was even a plugin ecosystem to Android Studio but of course there is.

    I might just use Android studio to set up the project and then do my actual keyboard-bashing in Neovim later. All I really want is the boilerplate set up properly and my app will be a single activity with maybe 3 views, so once that’s all generated I’ll try switching.

    Out of interest, what has been the failure points for you trying this in the past?


  • Thanks for reply comrade. I’m not really a Javascript person, but it’s good to know there are alternatives to use for building apps quickly. The last time I used Javascript for anything was jQuery on a website in 2017 and even I think it was outdated in favour of all the fancy frameworks. I haven’t the head for keeping up with it al.

    I also got burned by multiplatform frameworks back during my undergrad during a group project when the self-elected team lead — a proper bourgie moneyed type who went to like Stow or something — forced us to use Titanium to build an android app when the rest of us wanted to write it in native Android Java. It was godawful, and then when I later came to developing apps I had a pleasant enough time writing in Java.





  • That really really sucks comrade.

    I understand you’re currently fighting to get your disability benefits restored. If you can show proof that you’ve historically been on benefits or income support then the NHS should give you them for free in the same way that you should have previously been receiving free prescriptions.

    Do you have a HC2 certificate? This entitles you to free NHS prescriptions, dental care, and fabric supports (which I assume these dressings fall under).

    https://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/nhs-low-income-scheme/hc2-certificates-full-help-health-costs

    You’re absolutely correct in that these things should be free, however the NHS has historically charged for fabric supports and wigs in the same way that they charge a nominal fee for prescriptions in most cases. The NHS absorbs the rest of the cost. This is crappy and puts you on the spot if you can’t afford it and aren’t prepared with evidence that you get free prescriptions, and I’m sorry you experienced this.

    There should be someone at the hospital or at the NHS trust you can speak to about getting the charges dismissed.


  • If you’re wanting to lift weights I recommend Starting Strength. If you are open to training bodyweight calisthenics in a strength-training style, I seriously recommend Convict Conditioning.

    When I lifted weights I did Starting Strength. Absolutely solid program, even if the author/coach gives off a few “don’t tread on me vibes”. I did this in my early twenties for about 18 months before I switched to a bodyweight strength training system, since I found bodyweight stuff to be more fun and allowed me to train outdoors in parks and whatnot.

    For the last 10 years I’ve basically been training using a slightly-tweaked Convict Conditioning system. Beyond the “grr convicts” gimmick in the book, the contents are top-notch and aren’t pitching anything other than using bodyweight exercises as a serious strength and muscle building tool. It really kickstarted the progressive calisthenics movement in the 2010s. I’ve grown bigger and stronger for a decade using the exercises in this and the follow-up book (which is focused on some assistance exercises). The author outright says that their goal is to give you the building blocks to make up your own routines from the basic principles and does a good job of this, but also provides some sample routines to get you started.

    In 2019 I threw in some mid-distance running (5ks and 10ks) as well, although I can’t run atm due to life things and injury. Running interferes pretty noticeably with recovery, and can slow down your strength/hypertrophy gains compared to a pure strength or hypertrophy system and some people really don’t like this. I found that I could still progress but it was a lot slower than before running, although I liked having the basis in cardio to complement the strength. I didn’t lose much strength or muscle mass because I ate more to compensate and over time my recovery ability increased notably.


  • Red MagpietoFediverse@lemmy.mlWhat to know about Threads
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I really don’t like the tone of some parts of this. Some of it is good, like reassurances around the privacy measures that Mastodon instances take to protect user IPs.

    The bit I most have an issue with specifically is the section on Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

    Well, even if Threads abandoned ActivityPub down the line, where we would end up is exactly where we are now. XMPP did not exist on its own outside of nerd circles, while ActivityPub enjoys the support and brand recognition of Mastodon.

    I think this misses the point or dismisses of some of the fears around Embrace, Extend, Extinguish and jumps straight to the idea that Threads may abandon ActivityPub. I don’t think this is the concern, and my major concern is around the Extend part of the strategy.

    Here’s the strategy, from the wikipedia page

    1. Embrace: Development of software substantially compatible with a competing product, or implementing a public standard.
    2. Extend: Addition and promotion of features not supported by the competing product or part of the standard, creating interoperability problems for customers who try to use the “simple” standard.
    3. Extinguish: When extensions become a de facto standard because of their dominant market share, they marginalize competitors that do not or cannot support the new extensions.

    ActivityPub implementation is already pretty heterogeneous which is both a strength and introduces some fragility into “The Federation”. We see this even between fediverse-centric platforms where certain interactions are supported or not supported. Right now, I can see a Mastodon account from a Lemmy interface but none of its posts. This is fine, because Lemmy is not Mastodon and its concerns are different and built around participation in communities; but it is a crack in the ActivityPub standard that’s exploitable.

    Following the strategy, Meta can start developing its own Threads-specific features which Fediverse implementors can choose to implement or not. Different Fediverse software implementations will need to make a decision as to whether they implement certain features, just as they do now. Some may refuse point-blank, which is fine. But this "[creates] interoperability problems for customers who try to use the ‘simple’ standard.".

    Recent posts from @dansup@mastodon.social and the linked blog post from @Gargron@mastodon.social indicate that they are at least nominally on board with Meta’s involvement in the Fediverse and are devolving the responsibility of blocking interaction with Threads onto Admins and Users. It’s of course impossible to accurately predict the future, but to me that indicates that there may be willingness to develop Threads-friendly functionalities in the future, at least in Mastodon and Pixelfed codebases.

    Certainly before the Reddit apocalypse, and arguably still now, Mastodon is seen as the flagship Fediverse platform. Eugene basically says it in his post:

    while ActivityPub enjoys the support and brand recognition of Mastodon.

    Again, fine. But that causes its own issues. This github issue highlights the concerns that diaspora* developers had over implementing ActivityPub as a federation protocol. In particular, this comment eloquently describes the heterogeneity of ActivityPub implementations. And also makes the following point, which I agree with:

    The current modus operandi seems to be to just look at Mastodon and copy their implementation because that seems to be the only way to get something working. That, however, is not about supporting AP, it’s about supporting Mastodon’s dialect of AP, and their subset of that.

    Mastodon is arguably a leader in the Fediverse space, and if Mastodon’s development trends towards supporting Meta’s extensions then everyone else may be inclined to keep up or risk losing some interoperability that users of their software have come to enjoy. Forking codebases doesn’t fix the issue; it just means there’s more implementations only supporting the “basic” implementation of the standard.

    In terms of what it means for the average user on the Fediverse? Who knows. Joining instances not federated to Meta or refusing non-Meta features is definitely viable as a strategy.

    For me personally, the major loss is the feeling that I’m in a space where there aren’t any major corporate players. I left those other platforms to seek community-run spaces where the software was a little janky and the servers sometimes crashed, but it was fine because They weren’t there. I feel that they’ve just barged back into my space now. I’ll probably get over it in time. I don’t use Mastodon and my Lemmy’ing is mostly limited to lemmygrad; but it’s still a little sad in the short-term.