• 1 Post
  • 41 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 2nd, 2023

help-circle




  • ram@feddit.nltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlWhere do you see yourself in 10 years?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Adblockers can do more than just block ads, they also allow you to customize websites. As a simple example you can remove the annoying headers on youtube channels that take half the screen:

    It’s also great for news sites. I have a filter to remove articles on topics I don’t care about. I also have rules to prevent these sites from automatically reloading after certain amount of time, something that I find very annoying.


  • ram@feddit.nltoProgrammer Humor@programming.devD or d come on
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    There are two Linux paradigms that I consider stupid. One is the use of centralized software repositories managed by the distro instead of individual developer maintained installers. The other one is file system case sensibility. They already admitted defeat on the first one with the rise of containerised applications. I wonder how much longer they’ll keep the charade on the second one.














  • ram@feddit.nltoTechnology@lemmy.worldEverything Made By an AI Is In the Public Domain
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I suspect with a creative enough prompt you will likely be able to claim copyright and author ship over the works.

    It seems that’s not the case, no matter how much effort or time you expend on the prompts. This is from the Copyright Office:

    The Office does not question Ms. Kashtanova’s contention that she expended significant time and effort working with Midjourney. But that effort does not make her the “author” of Midjourney images under copyright law. Courts have rejected the argument that “sweat of the brow” can be a basis for copyright protection in otherwise unprotectable material.18 The Office “will not consider the amount of time, effort, or expense required to create the work” because they “have no bearing on whether a work possesses the minimum creative spark required by the Copyright Act and the Constitution.”

    Here’s another key factor:

    Because of the significant distance between what a user may direct Midjourney to create and the visual material Midjourney actually produces, Midjourney users lack sufficient control over generated images to be treated as the “master mind” behind them. The fact that Midjourney’s specific output cannot be predicted by users makes Midjourney different for copyright purposes than other tools used by artists.

    This only applies to an image generated with AI prompts that isn’t significantly altered by an artist.