• 67 Posts
  • 252 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 28th, 2023

help-circle

  • fer0n@lemm.eetoMemesLiberals On Violence
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    No way am I saying it should go unopposed. But I also don’t think “ripping out intruders and casting them into fire” is going to be a feasible solution in this case.

    I don’t live in the US btw, if that’s what you mean by “Settler”.

    (Are we continuing the discussion by editing the comments now? ^^)



  • fer0n@lemm.eetoMemesLiberals On Violence
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I‘m not trying to argue for one side here and I’m certainly no expert in this conflict. All I’ve been saying is that violence is probably not going to be the solution here. Especially not the kind of violence that Israel is and has been putting Palestinians through.


  • fer0n@lemm.eetoMemesLiberals On Violence
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Apparently that’s an unpopular opinion, but to free themselves the ideal path forward is to conduct terrorist attacks on civilians? That certainly didn’t seem to improve things. And bombing civilians isn’t a great response either.


  • fer0n@lemm.eetoMemesLiberals On Violence
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    8 months ago

    Maybe how the conflict itself came to be isn’t simple (and calling anything simple that involves politics is probably always wrong). But the situation for the people in the Ukraine itself is pretty simple. They’re being attacked and they’re defending themselves.


  • fer0n@lemm.eetoMemesLiberals On Violence
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I mean … one of these is a violent conflict where mostly civilians are being hit, on both sides. The other is a country defending itself from an invasion. One of these is really complicated and I’m pretty sure violence won’t solve much. The other one really isn’t complicated on the same level and violence (defense) is pretty much the only choice.

















  • fer0n@lemm.eeOPtoApple@lemmy.worldResident Evil 4 for iPhone Will Cost $60
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yes and no. The mobile game market is very different from PC/console. The size, age group, how much users are willing to spend etc. Pricing isn’t just about the product, it’s about the market as well as many other factors.

    So far, the majority of PC games are around that price point, on mobile most games are f2p. I can’t think of any other game with a price of $60.

    I’m not saying it should be cheaper, but I’m curious to see how much of a success this will be at that price point combined with iPhone 15 pro only. It’s certainly an interesting move and different from what I’ve seen so far for mobile phone pricing.

    I’ll get it on PSVR as soon as that’s out.




  • I‘d be super interested to see what Apple‘s “low” cost version of the Vision Pro would look like. Assuming the Vision Pro is already the bare minimum for them, with some weird Apple-unlike compromises like the external battery. The outside display seems to be an obvious thing as it won’t make a huge difference to the actual user (at least directly), but I have a feeling Apple won’t ever ship a Vision headset that walls the user off.

    Maybe that’s the reason, there is no version of the headset that is cheaper with everything Apple wants it to be and have, so it simply won’t happen.